Nextera XT和Collibri ES文库制备试剂盒的比较:从湿实验室到生物信息学分析

Layla Nassar-Miguez, Andrés Flores-Cruz, Ivannia Atmetlla-Salazar, Rebeca Campos-Sánchez
{"title":"Nextera XT和Collibri ES文库制备试剂盒的比较:从湿实验室到生物信息学分析","authors":"Layla Nassar-Miguez, Andrés Flores-Cruz, Ivannia Atmetlla-Salazar, Rebeca Campos-Sánchez","doi":"10.1109/BIP56202.2022.10032483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whole genome sequencing (WGS) analyses are key for a great number of studies nowadays. In order to carry out WGS, DNA is fragmented and adapter sequences are added to each end. This input format is most commonly known as ‘libraries’ and there are multiple methods to prepare them. Herein, we compared two DNA library preparation kits (Nextera XT and Collibri™) with distinct enzymatic fragmentation strategies to sequence four Clostridium perfringens isolates. Based on a thorough statistical and bioinformatics analysis, we concluded that Collibri™ performs better than Nextera XT as the former produced more complete assemblies, showed more coverage and depth when mapped to the reference genome and was unbiased towards regions with particular GC% in comparison to the latter.","PeriodicalId":161872,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 4th International Conference on BioInspired Processing (BIP)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Nextera XT and Collibri ES library preparation kits: from wet lab to bioinformatics analysis\",\"authors\":\"Layla Nassar-Miguez, Andrés Flores-Cruz, Ivannia Atmetlla-Salazar, Rebeca Campos-Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BIP56202.2022.10032483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whole genome sequencing (WGS) analyses are key for a great number of studies nowadays. In order to carry out WGS, DNA is fragmented and adapter sequences are added to each end. This input format is most commonly known as ‘libraries’ and there are multiple methods to prepare them. Herein, we compared two DNA library preparation kits (Nextera XT and Collibri™) with distinct enzymatic fragmentation strategies to sequence four Clostridium perfringens isolates. Based on a thorough statistical and bioinformatics analysis, we concluded that Collibri™ performs better than Nextera XT as the former produced more complete assemblies, showed more coverage and depth when mapped to the reference genome and was unbiased towards regions with particular GC% in comparison to the latter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 4th International Conference on BioInspired Processing (BIP)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 4th International Conference on BioInspired Processing (BIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIP56202.2022.10032483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 4th International Conference on BioInspired Processing (BIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIP56202.2022.10032483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全基因组测序(WGS)分析是当今许多研究的关键。为了进行WGS,将DNA片段化,并在每一端添加适配器序列。这种输入格式通常被称为“库”,有多种方法来准备它们。在此,我们比较了两种DNA文库制备试剂盒(Nextera XT和Collibri™)采用不同的酶裂解策略对四种产气荚膜梭菌分离物进行测序。基于全面的统计和生物信息学分析,我们得出结论,Collibri™比Nextera XT表现更好,因为前者产生更完整的片段,在映射到参考基因组时显示更多的覆盖范围和深度,并且与后者相比,对特定GC%的区域不偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Nextera XT and Collibri ES library preparation kits: from wet lab to bioinformatics analysis
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) analyses are key for a great number of studies nowadays. In order to carry out WGS, DNA is fragmented and adapter sequences are added to each end. This input format is most commonly known as ‘libraries’ and there are multiple methods to prepare them. Herein, we compared two DNA library preparation kits (Nextera XT and Collibri™) with distinct enzymatic fragmentation strategies to sequence four Clostridium perfringens isolates. Based on a thorough statistical and bioinformatics analysis, we concluded that Collibri™ performs better than Nextera XT as the former produced more complete assemblies, showed more coverage and depth when mapped to the reference genome and was unbiased towards regions with particular GC% in comparison to the latter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信