Noriyoshi Kuno, Tsuyoshi Nakajima, M. Matsushita, Katsuro Inoue
{"title":"同行评议会议的有效性研究","authors":"Noriyoshi Kuno, Tsuyoshi Nakajima, M. Matsushita, Katsuro Inoue","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiveness of peer review meetings in software development has been discussed for many years. Porter concludes that peer review meetings do not contribute significantly to defect extraction. This paper shows contradictory data to the Porter's findings and our interpretation for them.","PeriodicalId":332420,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on the effectiveness of peer review meeting\",\"authors\":\"Noriyoshi Kuno, Tsuyoshi Nakajima, M. Matsushita, Katsuro Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effectiveness of peer review meetings in software development has been discussed for many years. Porter concludes that peer review meetings do not contribute significantly to defect extraction. This paper shows contradictory data to the Porter's findings and our interpretation for them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A study on the effectiveness of peer review meeting
The effectiveness of peer review meetings in software development has been discussed for many years. Porter concludes that peer review meetings do not contribute significantly to defect extraction. This paper shows contradictory data to the Porter's findings and our interpretation for them.