公共价值观念如何影响英国网络公用事业监管?

M. Cave, Janet Wright
{"title":"公共价值观念如何影响英国网络公用事业监管?","authors":"M. Cave, Janet Wright","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3746870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is much recent debate about extending the purposes of investor-owned firms to embrace the wider interests of a variety of stakeholders. Network regulatory decisions already involve extensive use of centralised social cost-benefit analysis to capture some aspects of public value. A gap remains which might be filled by a decentralised process, in which firms are supported by their regulator to expand their purposes to include the pursuit of public value, identified by regulated firms in collaboration with consumers and citizens, and delivered in innovative and entrepreneurial ways. We conclude in general, in application to a case study, that the approach has a role, but its success depends critically upon investor-owned utilities taking the change in purposes seriously; collecting and acting on information about consumer and citizen preferences systematically; and upon regulators avoiding incentive structures which guide companies down dysfunctional paths.<br><br>","PeriodicalId":150569,"journal":{"name":"IO: Theory eJournal","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Can the Concept of Public Value Influence UK Network Utility Regulation?\",\"authors\":\"M. Cave, Janet Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3746870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is much recent debate about extending the purposes of investor-owned firms to embrace the wider interests of a variety of stakeholders. Network regulatory decisions already involve extensive use of centralised social cost-benefit analysis to capture some aspects of public value. A gap remains which might be filled by a decentralised process, in which firms are supported by their regulator to expand their purposes to include the pursuit of public value, identified by regulated firms in collaboration with consumers and citizens, and delivered in innovative and entrepreneurial ways. We conclude in general, in application to a case study, that the approach has a role, but its success depends critically upon investor-owned utilities taking the change in purposes seriously; collecting and acting on information about consumer and citizen preferences systematically; and upon regulators avoiding incentive structures which guide companies down dysfunctional paths.<br><br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":150569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Theory eJournal\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Theory eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3746870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Theory eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3746870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近有很多关于扩大投资者所有公司的目的以包括各种利益相关者的更广泛利益的争论。网络监管决策已经涉及广泛使用集中的社会成本效益分析,以捕捉公共价值的某些方面。仍然存在一个缺口,可以通过一个分散的过程来填补,在这个过程中,企业得到监管机构的支持,扩大其目标,包括追求公共价值,由受监管的企业与消费者和公民合作确定,并以创新和创业的方式实现。总的来说,在应用于案例研究时,我们得出结论,该方法具有一定的作用,但其成功关键取决于投资者拥有的公用事业公司是否认真对待目的的变化;系统地收集有关消费者和公民偏好的信息并采取行动;监管机构应避免引导企业走上不正常道路的激励结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Can the Concept of Public Value Influence UK Network Utility Regulation?
There is much recent debate about extending the purposes of investor-owned firms to embrace the wider interests of a variety of stakeholders. Network regulatory decisions already involve extensive use of centralised social cost-benefit analysis to capture some aspects of public value. A gap remains which might be filled by a decentralised process, in which firms are supported by their regulator to expand their purposes to include the pursuit of public value, identified by regulated firms in collaboration with consumers and citizens, and delivered in innovative and entrepreneurial ways. We conclude in general, in application to a case study, that the approach has a role, but its success depends critically upon investor-owned utilities taking the change in purposes seriously; collecting and acting on information about consumer and citizen preferences systematically; and upon regulators avoiding incentive structures which guide companies down dysfunctional paths.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信