惩罚破产诈骗犯:印尼可以向美国学习什么?

R. Robert, Rosa Agustina, B. Nasution
{"title":"惩罚破产诈骗犯:印尼可以向美国学习什么?","authors":"R. Robert, Rosa Agustina, B. Nasution","doi":"10.20884/1.JDH.2020.20.1.2874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bankruptcy is a system that was created to provide financially distressed debtors relief from their debts while providing the creditors with a fair portion of the debtors’ assets. Unfortunately, certain parties might attempt to beat the system unfairly. The goals of this study are to compare Title 18 United States Code with Indonesia’s legal system regarding bankruptcy fraud and how the Indonesian bankruptcy law ought to be in regulating bankruptcy fraud. This research is qualitative, using a black letter method and legal comparative approach. The result of this study shows that Indonesian bankruptcy law does not regulate provisions regarding bankruptcy fraud as comprehensive as Title 18 United States Code. It is suggested that the Indonesian government amends the bankruptcy law, therefore the public’s confidence in the bankruptcy system can be preserved while providing a deterrence effect for the participants who might exploit the bankruptcy system for their advantages. Keywords: bankruptcy; bankruptcy crime; fraud; white collar crime","PeriodicalId":280058,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Punishing The Bankruptcy Fraudsters: What Can Indonesia Learn from United States of America?\",\"authors\":\"R. Robert, Rosa Agustina, B. Nasution\",\"doi\":\"10.20884/1.JDH.2020.20.1.2874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bankruptcy is a system that was created to provide financially distressed debtors relief from their debts while providing the creditors with a fair portion of the debtors’ assets. Unfortunately, certain parties might attempt to beat the system unfairly. The goals of this study are to compare Title 18 United States Code with Indonesia’s legal system regarding bankruptcy fraud and how the Indonesian bankruptcy law ought to be in regulating bankruptcy fraud. This research is qualitative, using a black letter method and legal comparative approach. The result of this study shows that Indonesian bankruptcy law does not regulate provisions regarding bankruptcy fraud as comprehensive as Title 18 United States Code. It is suggested that the Indonesian government amends the bankruptcy law, therefore the public’s confidence in the bankruptcy system can be preserved while providing a deterrence effect for the participants who might exploit the bankruptcy system for their advantages. Keywords: bankruptcy; bankruptcy crime; fraud; white collar crime\",\"PeriodicalId\":280058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.JDH.2020.20.1.2874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.JDH.2020.20.1.2874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

破产是一种制度,旨在为陷入财务困境的债务人提供债务救济,同时向债权人提供债务人资产的公平部分。不幸的是,某些政党可能会试图以不公平的方式击败这一制度。本研究的目的是比较美国法典第18章与印度尼西亚关于破产欺诈的法律制度,以及印度尼西亚破产法应该如何规范破产欺诈。本研究采用定性方法,采用黑体字法和法律比较法。本研究的结果表明,印尼破产法对破产欺诈的规定并不像美国法典第18篇那样全面。建议印尼政府修改破产法,既能保持公众对破产制度的信心,又能对可能利用破产制度谋取利益的参与者起到威慑作用。关键词:破产;破产犯罪;欺诈;白领犯罪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Punishing The Bankruptcy Fraudsters: What Can Indonesia Learn from United States of America?
Bankruptcy is a system that was created to provide financially distressed debtors relief from their debts while providing the creditors with a fair portion of the debtors’ assets. Unfortunately, certain parties might attempt to beat the system unfairly. The goals of this study are to compare Title 18 United States Code with Indonesia’s legal system regarding bankruptcy fraud and how the Indonesian bankruptcy law ought to be in regulating bankruptcy fraud. This research is qualitative, using a black letter method and legal comparative approach. The result of this study shows that Indonesian bankruptcy law does not regulate provisions regarding bankruptcy fraud as comprehensive as Title 18 United States Code. It is suggested that the Indonesian government amends the bankruptcy law, therefore the public’s confidence in the bankruptcy system can be preserved while providing a deterrence effect for the participants who might exploit the bankruptcy system for their advantages. Keywords: bankruptcy; bankruptcy crime; fraud; white collar crime
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信