基于车间的多目标安全防护选择

T. Neubauer, C. Stummer, E. Weippl
{"title":"基于车间的多目标安全防护选择","authors":"T. Neubauer, C. Stummer, E. Weippl","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2006.144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Companies spend considerable amounts of resources on minimizing security breaches but often neglect efficient security measures and/or are not aware whether their investments are effective. While security safeguards traditionally are evaluated through a single (aggregated) criterion such as the return on investment, this may not suffice any longer as economic and legal requirements force top management to pay more attention to security issues. Thus, there is a demand for decision support tools that assist decision makers in allocating security safeguards with respect to multiple objectives of the involved stakeholders. This paper proposes a tool called MOS/sup 3/T (multi-objective security safeguard selection tool), that integrates ideas from multiobjective decision making in a workshop environment The stepwise procedure for the assessment and interactive selection of sets of security safeguards improves security awareness of top management while minimizing the resources required for implementing a proper security environment that meets a corporate's needs.","PeriodicalId":106780,"journal":{"name":"First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)","volume":"530 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workshop-based multiobjective security safeguard selection\",\"authors\":\"T. Neubauer, C. Stummer, E. Weippl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARES.2006.144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Companies spend considerable amounts of resources on minimizing security breaches but often neglect efficient security measures and/or are not aware whether their investments are effective. While security safeguards traditionally are evaluated through a single (aggregated) criterion such as the return on investment, this may not suffice any longer as economic and legal requirements force top management to pay more attention to security issues. Thus, there is a demand for decision support tools that assist decision makers in allocating security safeguards with respect to multiple objectives of the involved stakeholders. This paper proposes a tool called MOS/sup 3/T (multi-objective security safeguard selection tool), that integrates ideas from multiobjective decision making in a workshop environment The stepwise procedure for the assessment and interactive selection of sets of security safeguards improves security awareness of top management while minimizing the resources required for implementing a proper security environment that meets a corporate's needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)\",\"volume\":\"530 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2006.144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2006.144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

公司在最小化安全漏洞上花费了相当多的资源,但往往忽视了有效的安全措施和/或不知道他们的投资是否有效。虽然安全保障传统上是通过单一(聚合)标准来评估的,例如投资回报,但这可能不再足够,因为经济和法律需求迫使最高管理层更多地关注安全问题。因此,需要决策支持工具来帮助决策者针对涉众的多个目标分配安全保障。本文提出了一种称为MOS/sup 3/T(多目标安全保障选择工具)的工具,该工具集成了车间环境中多目标决策的思想。安全保障措施集的逐步评估和交互式选择过程提高了最高管理层的安全意识,同时最大限度地减少了实现满足企业需求的适当安全环境所需的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workshop-based multiobjective security safeguard selection
Companies spend considerable amounts of resources on minimizing security breaches but often neglect efficient security measures and/or are not aware whether their investments are effective. While security safeguards traditionally are evaluated through a single (aggregated) criterion such as the return on investment, this may not suffice any longer as economic and legal requirements force top management to pay more attention to security issues. Thus, there is a demand for decision support tools that assist decision makers in allocating security safeguards with respect to multiple objectives of the involved stakeholders. This paper proposes a tool called MOS/sup 3/T (multi-objective security safeguard selection tool), that integrates ideas from multiobjective decision making in a workshop environment The stepwise procedure for the assessment and interactive selection of sets of security safeguards improves security awareness of top management while minimizing the resources required for implementing a proper security environment that meets a corporate's needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信