{"title":"真甲纲甲壳纲内的关系","authors":"F. Schram","doi":"10.5962/BHL.PART.29008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". A cladistic analysis was performed on 20 constituent higher taxa within the Eumala-costraca based on 3 1 characters of external anatomy. Variants of the most parsimonious scheme are presented, and the effects of tolerating different levels of uncertainty are evaluated. It is concluded that: 1) while the basic outline of Caiman's (1904) taxonomy of Eumalacostraca might be utilized, the arrangement within peracarids postulated by Siewing (1956) cannot be maintained; 2) the Baupldne approach of Schram (1981) has some merit and some of the controversial higher taxonomic groupings of eumalacostracan \"orders\" originally indicated by that method are vindicated; 3) the idea that the carapace is a derived feature within eumalacostracans, advanced by Dahl (1983), can be maintained only if a high level of homoplasy is tolerated; 4) the concept of a taxon Mysidacea seems best abandoned.","PeriodicalId":417333,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the San Diego society of natural history","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships Within Eumalacostracan Crustacea\",\"authors\":\"F. Schram\",\"doi\":\"10.5962/BHL.PART.29008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". A cladistic analysis was performed on 20 constituent higher taxa within the Eumala-costraca based on 3 1 characters of external anatomy. Variants of the most parsimonious scheme are presented, and the effects of tolerating different levels of uncertainty are evaluated. It is concluded that: 1) while the basic outline of Caiman's (1904) taxonomy of Eumalacostraca might be utilized, the arrangement within peracarids postulated by Siewing (1956) cannot be maintained; 2) the Baupldne approach of Schram (1981) has some merit and some of the controversial higher taxonomic groupings of eumalacostracan \\\"orders\\\" originally indicated by that method are vindicated; 3) the idea that the carapace is a derived feature within eumalacostracans, advanced by Dahl (1983), can be maintained only if a high level of homoplasy is tolerated; 4) the concept of a taxon Mysidacea seems best abandoned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the San Diego society of natural history\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the San Diego society of natural history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5962/BHL.PART.29008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the San Diego society of natural history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5962/BHL.PART.29008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
. A cladistic analysis was performed on 20 constituent higher taxa within the Eumala-costraca based on 3 1 characters of external anatomy. Variants of the most parsimonious scheme are presented, and the effects of tolerating different levels of uncertainty are evaluated. It is concluded that: 1) while the basic outline of Caiman's (1904) taxonomy of Eumalacostraca might be utilized, the arrangement within peracarids postulated by Siewing (1956) cannot be maintained; 2) the Baupldne approach of Schram (1981) has some merit and some of the controversial higher taxonomic groupings of eumalacostracan "orders" originally indicated by that method are vindicated; 3) the idea that the carapace is a derived feature within eumalacostracans, advanced by Dahl (1983), can be maintained only if a high level of homoplasy is tolerated; 4) the concept of a taxon Mysidacea seems best abandoned.