真甲纲甲壳纲内的关系

F. Schram
{"title":"真甲纲甲壳纲内的关系","authors":"F. Schram","doi":"10.5962/BHL.PART.29008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". A cladistic analysis was performed on 20 constituent higher taxa within the Eumala-costraca based on 3 1 characters of external anatomy. Variants of the most parsimonious scheme are presented, and the effects of tolerating different levels of uncertainty are evaluated. It is concluded that: 1) while the basic outline of Caiman's (1904) taxonomy of Eumalacostraca might be utilized, the arrangement within peracarids postulated by Siewing (1956) cannot be maintained; 2) the Baupldne approach of Schram (1981) has some merit and some of the controversial higher taxonomic groupings of eumalacostracan \"orders\" originally indicated by that method are vindicated; 3) the idea that the carapace is a derived feature within eumalacostracans, advanced by Dahl (1983), can be maintained only if a high level of homoplasy is tolerated; 4) the concept of a taxon Mysidacea seems best abandoned.","PeriodicalId":417333,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the San Diego society of natural history","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships Within Eumalacostracan Crustacea\",\"authors\":\"F. Schram\",\"doi\":\"10.5962/BHL.PART.29008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". A cladistic analysis was performed on 20 constituent higher taxa within the Eumala-costraca based on 3 1 characters of external anatomy. Variants of the most parsimonious scheme are presented, and the effects of tolerating different levels of uncertainty are evaluated. It is concluded that: 1) while the basic outline of Caiman's (1904) taxonomy of Eumalacostraca might be utilized, the arrangement within peracarids postulated by Siewing (1956) cannot be maintained; 2) the Baupldne approach of Schram (1981) has some merit and some of the controversial higher taxonomic groupings of eumalacostracan \\\"orders\\\" originally indicated by that method are vindicated; 3) the idea that the carapace is a derived feature within eumalacostracans, advanced by Dahl (1983), can be maintained only if a high level of homoplasy is tolerated; 4) the concept of a taxon Mysidacea seems best abandoned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the San Diego society of natural history\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the San Diego society of natural history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5962/BHL.PART.29008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the San Diego society of natural history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5962/BHL.PART.29008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

. 根据31个外部解剖特征,对榆科20个高等分类群进行了分支分析。提出了最简洁方案的变体,并评估了容忍不同程度不确定性的效果。结果表明:1)虽然可以利用Caiman(1904)的Eumalacostraca分类的基本轮廓,但不能维持siwing(1956)假设的peracarids内的排列;(2) Schram(1981)的Baupldne方法有一定的优点,证明了该方法最初指出的一些有争议的真鲷“目”高级分类群是正确的;3)由Dahl(1983)提出的甲壳是真甲类的派生特征的观点,只有在高度同质性被容忍的情况下才能维持;Mysidacea分类群的概念似乎最好放弃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationships Within Eumalacostracan Crustacea
. A cladistic analysis was performed on 20 constituent higher taxa within the Eumala-costraca based on 3 1 characters of external anatomy. Variants of the most parsimonious scheme are presented, and the effects of tolerating different levels of uncertainty are evaluated. It is concluded that: 1) while the basic outline of Caiman's (1904) taxonomy of Eumalacostraca might be utilized, the arrangement within peracarids postulated by Siewing (1956) cannot be maintained; 2) the Baupldne approach of Schram (1981) has some merit and some of the controversial higher taxonomic groupings of eumalacostracan "orders" originally indicated by that method are vindicated; 3) the idea that the carapace is a derived feature within eumalacostracans, advanced by Dahl (1983), can be maintained only if a high level of homoplasy is tolerated; 4) the concept of a taxon Mysidacea seems best abandoned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信