{"title":"腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管交界处梗阻:我们的单中心经验","authors":"R. Joshi","doi":"10.3126/jkmc.v8i4.32387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Open pyeloplasty is considered as the gold standard for the treatment of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has added advantages with equivalent success rate and low complication rate. Objectives: The aim is to study our experiences in laparoscopic retroperitoneal and transperitoneal pyeloplasty. Methodology: Sixty-five patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction were included in the study. The study was conducted between October 2016 and May 2019 at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital. Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction was evaluated by ultrasound and intravenous or computed tomography urography. Clinical history, hospital stay, complications, success rate and functional outcome were analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences,version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was taken as significant. Followup of the patients was carried out for six to twelve months clinically and radiologically. Results: Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty was performed in 27 males and 8 females. Retroperitoneal pyeloplasty was performed in 30 cases (20 males and 10 females). The mean age was 20.26 ± 3.92 years for all cases. Operative time was longer in retroperitoneal group. There were four conversions in retroperitoneal group. Mean hospital stay was longer in retroperitoneal group with significant p-value<0.001. Success rate was almost similar in both groups with insignificant p-value of 0.46. Conclusion: Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty group achieved better results than retroperitoneal pyeloplasty group in terms of hospital stay, complication and drain placement but with almost similar success rate.","PeriodicalId":254049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kathmandu Medical College","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: Our single center experience\",\"authors\":\"R. Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/jkmc.v8i4.32387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Open pyeloplasty is considered as the gold standard for the treatment of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has added advantages with equivalent success rate and low complication rate. Objectives: The aim is to study our experiences in laparoscopic retroperitoneal and transperitoneal pyeloplasty. Methodology: Sixty-five patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction were included in the study. The study was conducted between October 2016 and May 2019 at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital. Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction was evaluated by ultrasound and intravenous or computed tomography urography. Clinical history, hospital stay, complications, success rate and functional outcome were analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences,version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was taken as significant. Followup of the patients was carried out for six to twelve months clinically and radiologically. Results: Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty was performed in 27 males and 8 females. Retroperitoneal pyeloplasty was performed in 30 cases (20 males and 10 females). The mean age was 20.26 ± 3.92 years for all cases. Operative time was longer in retroperitoneal group. There were four conversions in retroperitoneal group. Mean hospital stay was longer in retroperitoneal group with significant p-value<0.001. Success rate was almost similar in both groups with insignificant p-value of 0.46. Conclusion: Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty group achieved better results than retroperitoneal pyeloplasty group in terms of hospital stay, complication and drain placement but with almost similar success rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Kathmandu Medical College\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Kathmandu Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v8i4.32387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kathmandu Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v8i4.32387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:开放式肾盂成形术被认为是治疗肾盂输尿管交界处梗阻的金标准。腹腔镜肾盂成形术具有同等成功率和低并发症的优点。目的:探讨腹腔镜下经腹膜后肾盂成形术的经验。方法:对65例盆腔输尿管交界处梗阻患者进行研究。该研究于2016年10月至2019年5月在加德满都医学院教学医院进行。盆腔输尿管连接处梗阻通过超声和静脉或计算机断层尿路造影进行评估。分析两组患者的临床病史、住院时间、并发症、成功率及功能结局。统计分析使用Statistical Package for the Social Sciences,version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)。p值< 0.05为显著性。对患者进行了6至12个月的临床和放射学随访。结果:经腹腔镜肾盂成形术男27例,女8例。行腹膜后肾盂成形术30例(男20例,女10例)。所有病例平均年龄20.26±3.92岁。腹膜后组手术时间更长。腹膜后组有4例转换。腹膜后组平均住院时间更长,p值<0.001。两组的成功率几乎相似,p值为0.46,差异不显著。结论:经腹膜腹腔镜肾盂成形术组在住院时间、并发症、引流管放置等方面均优于腹膜后肾盂成形术组,但成功率相近。
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: Our single center experience
Background: Open pyeloplasty is considered as the gold standard for the treatment of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has added advantages with equivalent success rate and low complication rate. Objectives: The aim is to study our experiences in laparoscopic retroperitoneal and transperitoneal pyeloplasty. Methodology: Sixty-five patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction were included in the study. The study was conducted between October 2016 and May 2019 at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital. Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction was evaluated by ultrasound and intravenous or computed tomography urography. Clinical history, hospital stay, complications, success rate and functional outcome were analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences,version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was taken as significant. Followup of the patients was carried out for six to twelve months clinically and radiologically. Results: Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty was performed in 27 males and 8 females. Retroperitoneal pyeloplasty was performed in 30 cases (20 males and 10 females). The mean age was 20.26 ± 3.92 years for all cases. Operative time was longer in retroperitoneal group. There were four conversions in retroperitoneal group. Mean hospital stay was longer in retroperitoneal group with significant p-value<0.001. Success rate was almost similar in both groups with insignificant p-value of 0.46. Conclusion: Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty group achieved better results than retroperitoneal pyeloplasty group in terms of hospital stay, complication and drain placement but with almost similar success rate.