第十一章

D. Nordstrom
{"title":"第十一章","authors":"D. Nordstrom","doi":"10.31826/9781463215491-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter identifies and examines various underlying ideological frameworks that appear to provide a conceptual logic for integrating the five principles of reconciliation within different conceptualizations of reconciliation. These ideological frames are idealtype conceptual constructions which provide systems of meaning for ideas around reconciliation. The underlying logic of how the various principles of reconciliation are linked to the creation or re-establishment of social order is explained by these ideological frameworks. The principle of national (top-down) versus local (bottom-up) approaches to reconciliation is then discussed with reference to these hypothesized ideological frameworks. Each framework provides a different understanding of why a top-down or bottom-up approach should be supported. The level to which different stakeholders subscribe to the various ideological frames is examined to see what light it sheds on patterns of conflict and agreement. 2. Ideological Frames of Reconciliation: The Conceptual Framework","PeriodicalId":240276,"journal":{"name":"Thermodynamics and Phase Transformations","volume":"156 Suppl 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 11\",\"authors\":\"D. Nordstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.31826/9781463215491-012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter identifies and examines various underlying ideological frameworks that appear to provide a conceptual logic for integrating the five principles of reconciliation within different conceptualizations of reconciliation. These ideological frames are idealtype conceptual constructions which provide systems of meaning for ideas around reconciliation. The underlying logic of how the various principles of reconciliation are linked to the creation or re-establishment of social order is explained by these ideological frameworks. The principle of national (top-down) versus local (bottom-up) approaches to reconciliation is then discussed with reference to these hypothesized ideological frameworks. Each framework provides a different understanding of why a top-down or bottom-up approach should be supported. The level to which different stakeholders subscribe to the various ideological frames is examined to see what light it sheds on patterns of conflict and agreement. 2. Ideological Frames of Reconciliation: The Conceptual Framework\",\"PeriodicalId\":240276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermodynamics and Phase Transformations\",\"volume\":\"156 Suppl 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermodynamics and Phase Transformations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463215491-012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermodynamics and Phase Transformations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463215491-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章确定并考察了各种潜在的意识形态框架,这些框架似乎为在不同的和解概念中整合和解的五项原则提供了概念逻辑。这些意识形态框架是理想型概念结构,为和解相关的思想提供了意义体系。这些意识形态框架解释了各种和解原则如何与社会秩序的创造或重建联系在一起的潜在逻辑。然后,根据这些假设的意识形态框架,讨论了国家(自上而下)与地方(自下而上)和解方法的原则。对于为什么应该支持自顶向下或自底向上的方法,每个框架都提供了不同的理解。不同的利益相关者对各种意识形态框架的认同程度被考察,以了解它对冲突和协议模式的启示。2. 和解的意识形态框架:概念框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 11
This chapter identifies and examines various underlying ideological frameworks that appear to provide a conceptual logic for integrating the five principles of reconciliation within different conceptualizations of reconciliation. These ideological frames are idealtype conceptual constructions which provide systems of meaning for ideas around reconciliation. The underlying logic of how the various principles of reconciliation are linked to the creation or re-establishment of social order is explained by these ideological frameworks. The principle of national (top-down) versus local (bottom-up) approaches to reconciliation is then discussed with reference to these hypothesized ideological frameworks. Each framework provides a different understanding of why a top-down or bottom-up approach should be supported. The level to which different stakeholders subscribe to the various ideological frames is examined to see what light it sheds on patterns of conflict and agreement. 2. Ideological Frames of Reconciliation: The Conceptual Framework
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信