三级保健中心弥漫性轴索损伤的分析和结果

S. Uppal, Visvanathan K
{"title":"三级保健中心弥漫性轴索损伤的分析和结果","authors":"S. Uppal, Visvanathan K","doi":"10.18231/j.ijn.2022.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To report the clinical features, radiological features and outcomes of patients with diffuse axonal injury in a tertiary care centre. Fifty five patients with history of trauma with low GCS and radiological evidence of DAI were studied from August 2016 to December 2018. It consisted 46 (84%) males and 9 (16%) females. Majority of the patients were in age group of 16-25. Most common modality of injury was RTA. Seven (12.7%) patients had grade 1 DAI, 36 (65.5%) patients had grade 2 DAI and 12 (21.8%) patients had grade 3 DAI. Follow up was done after 3 months of injury. Patients outcome was analysed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Patients with GCS 3-8 had GOS 1-3. Patients with GCS of 9-12 had GOS of 3-4 and Patients with GCS of 13-15 had GOS of 4-5. Most patients in our study had grade 2 DAI and GOS 4. Diffuse axonal injury is devastating types of traumatic brain injury. The acceleration-deceleration mechanism is responsible for DAI. It is most commonly analyzed based on the outcomes of GOS Scale. Most of the patients in this study had grade 2 DAI. Good recovery was seen in grade 1 and 2 DAI and high mortality in grade 3 DAI.","PeriodicalId":415114,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Neurosciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis and outcomes of diffuse axonal injury in tertiary care centre\",\"authors\":\"S. Uppal, Visvanathan K\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijn.2022.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To report the clinical features, radiological features and outcomes of patients with diffuse axonal injury in a tertiary care centre. Fifty five patients with history of trauma with low GCS and radiological evidence of DAI were studied from August 2016 to December 2018. It consisted 46 (84%) males and 9 (16%) females. Majority of the patients were in age group of 16-25. Most common modality of injury was RTA. Seven (12.7%) patients had grade 1 DAI, 36 (65.5%) patients had grade 2 DAI and 12 (21.8%) patients had grade 3 DAI. Follow up was done after 3 months of injury. Patients outcome was analysed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Patients with GCS 3-8 had GOS 1-3. Patients with GCS of 9-12 had GOS of 3-4 and Patients with GCS of 13-15 had GOS of 4-5. Most patients in our study had grade 2 DAI and GOS 4. Diffuse axonal injury is devastating types of traumatic brain injury. The acceleration-deceleration mechanism is responsible for DAI. It is most commonly analyzed based on the outcomes of GOS Scale. Most of the patients in this study had grade 2 DAI. Good recovery was seen in grade 1 and 2 DAI and high mortality in grade 3 DAI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IP Indian Journal of Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IP Indian Journal of Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2022.028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2022.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

报告三级保健中心弥漫性轴索损伤患者的临床特征、影像学特征和预后。本研究于2016年8月至2018年12月对55例创伤史伴低GCS和DAI影像学证据的患者进行了研究。其中男性46人(84%),女性9人(16%)。患者以16 ~ 25岁年龄组居多。最常见的损伤方式是RTA。7例(12.7%)为1级DAI, 36例(65.5%)为2级DAI, 12例(21.8%)为3级DAI。伤后3个月随访。使用格拉斯哥预后量表分析患者预后。GCS 3-8的患者GOS 1-3。GCS值为9 ~ 12的患者GOS值为3 ~ 4,GCS值为13 ~ 15的患者GOS值为4 ~ 5。在我们的研究中,大多数患者为2级DAI和4级GOS。弥漫性轴索损伤是一种毁灭性的创伤性脑损伤。加速-减速机制负责DAI。最常用的是根据GOS量表的结果进行分析。本研究中大多数患者为2级DAI。1级和2级DAI恢复良好,3级DAI死亡率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis and outcomes of diffuse axonal injury in tertiary care centre
To report the clinical features, radiological features and outcomes of patients with diffuse axonal injury in a tertiary care centre. Fifty five patients with history of trauma with low GCS and radiological evidence of DAI were studied from August 2016 to December 2018. It consisted 46 (84%) males and 9 (16%) females. Majority of the patients were in age group of 16-25. Most common modality of injury was RTA. Seven (12.7%) patients had grade 1 DAI, 36 (65.5%) patients had grade 2 DAI and 12 (21.8%) patients had grade 3 DAI. Follow up was done after 3 months of injury. Patients outcome was analysed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Patients with GCS 3-8 had GOS 1-3. Patients with GCS of 9-12 had GOS of 3-4 and Patients with GCS of 13-15 had GOS of 4-5. Most patients in our study had grade 2 DAI and GOS 4. Diffuse axonal injury is devastating types of traumatic brain injury. The acceleration-deceleration mechanism is responsible for DAI. It is most commonly analyzed based on the outcomes of GOS Scale. Most of the patients in this study had grade 2 DAI. Good recovery was seen in grade 1 and 2 DAI and high mortality in grade 3 DAI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信