1.79-连续评审单源损失销售和双源库存模型的近似算法

Linwei Xin
{"title":"1.79-连续评审单源损失销售和双源库存模型的近似算法","authors":"Linwei Xin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3484315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stochastic inventory systems with lead times are often challenging to optimize, including single-sourcing lost-sales and dual-sourcing systems. Recent numerical results suggest that capped policies demonstrate superior performance over existing heuristics. However, the superior performance lacks a theoretical foundation. In “1.79-Approximation Algorithms for Continuous Review Single-Sourcing Lost-Sales and Dual-Sourcing Inventory Models,” the author provides a theoretical foundation for this phenomenon in two classical inventory models. First, in a continuous review lost-sales model with lead times and Poisson demand, he proves that a capped base-stock policy has a worst-case performance guarantee of 1.79 by conducting an asymptotic analysis under a large penalty cost and lead time. Second, in a more complex continuous review dual-sourcing model with general lead times and Poisson demand, he proves that a similar capped dual-index policy has a worst-case performance guarantee of 1.79 under large lead time and ordering cost differences. The results provide a deeper understanding of the superior numerical performance of capped policies and present a new approach to proving worst-case performance guarantees of simple policies in hard inventory problems.","PeriodicalId":224732,"journal":{"name":"Chicago Booth Research Paper Series","volume":"151 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1.79-Approximation Algorithms for Continuous Review Single-Sourcing Lost-Sales and Dual-Sourcing Inventory Models\",\"authors\":\"Linwei Xin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3484315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stochastic inventory systems with lead times are often challenging to optimize, including single-sourcing lost-sales and dual-sourcing systems. Recent numerical results suggest that capped policies demonstrate superior performance over existing heuristics. However, the superior performance lacks a theoretical foundation. In “1.79-Approximation Algorithms for Continuous Review Single-Sourcing Lost-Sales and Dual-Sourcing Inventory Models,” the author provides a theoretical foundation for this phenomenon in two classical inventory models. First, in a continuous review lost-sales model with lead times and Poisson demand, he proves that a capped base-stock policy has a worst-case performance guarantee of 1.79 by conducting an asymptotic analysis under a large penalty cost and lead time. Second, in a more complex continuous review dual-sourcing model with general lead times and Poisson demand, he proves that a similar capped dual-index policy has a worst-case performance guarantee of 1.79 under large lead time and ordering cost differences. The results provide a deeper understanding of the superior numerical performance of capped policies and present a new approach to proving worst-case performance guarantees of simple policies in hard inventory problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chicago Booth Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"151 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chicago Booth Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicago Booth Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

具有交货期的随机库存系统通常很难优化,包括单源销售损失和双源系统。最近的数值结果表明,上限策略比现有的启发式策略表现出更好的性能。然而,这种优越的绩效缺乏理论基础。在《1.79-连续评审单源损失销售和双源库存模型的近似算法》中,作者在两种经典库存模型中为这一现象提供了理论基础。首先,在具有提前期和泊松需求的连续评审损失销售模型中,通过在较大的惩罚成本和提前期下的渐近分析,证明了上限基础库存策略的最坏情况性能保证为1.79。其次,在具有一般交货期和泊松需求的更复杂的连续评审双源模型中,他证明了在较大的交货期和订货成本差异下,类似的上限双指标策略在最坏情况下的性能保证为1.79。结果提供了对上限策略优越的数值性能的更深层次的理解,并提供了一种新的方法来证明在硬库存问题中简单策略的最坏情况性能保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
1.79-Approximation Algorithms for Continuous Review Single-Sourcing Lost-Sales and Dual-Sourcing Inventory Models
Stochastic inventory systems with lead times are often challenging to optimize, including single-sourcing lost-sales and dual-sourcing systems. Recent numerical results suggest that capped policies demonstrate superior performance over existing heuristics. However, the superior performance lacks a theoretical foundation. In “1.79-Approximation Algorithms for Continuous Review Single-Sourcing Lost-Sales and Dual-Sourcing Inventory Models,” the author provides a theoretical foundation for this phenomenon in two classical inventory models. First, in a continuous review lost-sales model with lead times and Poisson demand, he proves that a capped base-stock policy has a worst-case performance guarantee of 1.79 by conducting an asymptotic analysis under a large penalty cost and lead time. Second, in a more complex continuous review dual-sourcing model with general lead times and Poisson demand, he proves that a similar capped dual-index policy has a worst-case performance guarantee of 1.79 under large lead time and ordering cost differences. The results provide a deeper understanding of the superior numerical performance of capped policies and present a new approach to proving worst-case performance guarantees of simple policies in hard inventory problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信