无约束力的规定

A. Diamond
{"title":"无约束力的规定","authors":"A. Diamond","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190263669.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The steady growth in imposed regulations, often defended on the basis of the precautionary principle (which forbids innovations until there is proof that they will cause no harm), increases the risks and costs of innovation for the entrepreneur. Many important innovations of the last century would not have occurred if the precautionary principle had been in operation. Organic regulation of the marketplace (including tort actions and private ratings firms) can counter injuries due to irresponsible firm behavior, without stifling innovation. OSHA regulations did not reduce workplace deaths; financial regulations did not stop the Crisis of 2008, and may have made it worse. Occupational licensing regulations protect incumbents, and reduce opportunity for the least well-off. By slowing new life-saving drugs, FDA regulations cause more deaths than they prevent. The Vodnoy paradox suggests that we favor regulations in areas where we are ignorant and oppose them in areas where we are knowledgeable.","PeriodicalId":342770,"journal":{"name":"Openness to Creative Destruction","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unbinding Regulations\",\"authors\":\"A. Diamond\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190263669.003.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The steady growth in imposed regulations, often defended on the basis of the precautionary principle (which forbids innovations until there is proof that they will cause no harm), increases the risks and costs of innovation for the entrepreneur. Many important innovations of the last century would not have occurred if the precautionary principle had been in operation. Organic regulation of the marketplace (including tort actions and private ratings firms) can counter injuries due to irresponsible firm behavior, without stifling innovation. OSHA regulations did not reduce workplace deaths; financial regulations did not stop the Crisis of 2008, and may have made it worse. Occupational licensing regulations protect incumbents, and reduce opportunity for the least well-off. By slowing new life-saving drugs, FDA regulations cause more deaths than they prevent. The Vodnoy paradox suggests that we favor regulations in areas where we are ignorant and oppose them in areas where we are knowledgeable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Openness to Creative Destruction\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Openness to Creative Destruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190263669.003.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Openness to Creative Destruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190263669.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强制性法规的稳步增长,通常以预防原则(在有证据证明创新不会造成伤害之前,禁止创新)为基础进行辩护,增加了企业家创新的风险和成本。如果预防原则得以实施,上个世纪的许多重要创新就不会发生。市场的有机监管(包括侵权行为和私人评级公司)可以对抗不负责任的企业行为造成的伤害,而不会扼杀创新。职业安全与卫生条例没有减少工作场所死亡;金融监管并没有阻止2008年的危机,反而可能使危机变得更糟。职业许可条例保护了在职者,减少了最不富裕的人的机会。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的规定减缓了新的救命药物的研发,导致的死亡人数超过了它们所能预防的死亡人数。沃特诺伊悖论表明,在我们不了解的领域,我们赞成监管,而在我们了解的领域,我们反对监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unbinding Regulations
The steady growth in imposed regulations, often defended on the basis of the precautionary principle (which forbids innovations until there is proof that they will cause no harm), increases the risks and costs of innovation for the entrepreneur. Many important innovations of the last century would not have occurred if the precautionary principle had been in operation. Organic regulation of the marketplace (including tort actions and private ratings firms) can counter injuries due to irresponsible firm behavior, without stifling innovation. OSHA regulations did not reduce workplace deaths; financial regulations did not stop the Crisis of 2008, and may have made it worse. Occupational licensing regulations protect incumbents, and reduce opportunity for the least well-off. By slowing new life-saving drugs, FDA regulations cause more deaths than they prevent. The Vodnoy paradox suggests that we favor regulations in areas where we are ignorant and oppose them in areas where we are knowledgeable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信