西苏门答腊省明打威群岛西伯利亚生物圈保护区管理政策分析

S. Ismanto, Ardinis Arbain, H. Helmi, D. Syukri
{"title":"西苏门答腊省明打威群岛西伯利亚生物圈保护区管理政策分析","authors":"S. Ismanto, Ardinis Arbain, H. Helmi, D. Syukri","doi":"10.25077/aijans.v2.i02.21-36.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research executed in Siberut island which has been specified Unesco as Biosphere Reserve. The purpose of research was to identify the policy which has been specified in Siberut, knows implementation of management, knows perception and participation of public and knows interaction of the parties involving in management Biosphere Reserve. Method applied is Inventory and contents analysis of policy, Indepth Interview with cross check, Open interview with descriptive qualitative and Inventory and Stakeholder analysis. Republic of Indonesia Government doesn't support expansion of Siberut Biosphere Reserve for all island. There is understanding difference and exploiting of Biosphere Reserve according to the Government with MAB-UNESCO so do with perception there are difference between publics Siberut with the Government. Local public assumes that forest Siberut is custom forest which its the domination stays at custom public according to custom Arat Sabulungan, where its the exploiting and management is done based on custom, but the Government considers to be state forest. Implementation of Siberut Biosphere Reserve Pledge based on Indicator Implementation released by Unesco, 1996 till now still uncommitting for overall of area Biosphere Reserve, except to of Core area (Siberut National Park). Implementation at core area based on Indicator Implementation (Unesco, 1996) mostly has been executed, except for Indikator 5,6,8,9 and 16. Role and influence MAB and TNS in Siberut still be low for the reason need to be improved. \nKeyword: Cagar Biosfer Siberut, Siberut Biosphere Reserve. \n ","PeriodicalId":422146,"journal":{"name":"Andalasian International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences (AIJANS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MANAGEMENT POLICY ANALYSIS OF SIBERUT BIOSPHERE RESERVE MENTAWAI ARCHEPELAGO DISTRIC WEST SUMATERA PROVINCE\",\"authors\":\"S. Ismanto, Ardinis Arbain, H. Helmi, D. Syukri\",\"doi\":\"10.25077/aijans.v2.i02.21-36.2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research executed in Siberut island which has been specified Unesco as Biosphere Reserve. The purpose of research was to identify the policy which has been specified in Siberut, knows implementation of management, knows perception and participation of public and knows interaction of the parties involving in management Biosphere Reserve. Method applied is Inventory and contents analysis of policy, Indepth Interview with cross check, Open interview with descriptive qualitative and Inventory and Stakeholder analysis. Republic of Indonesia Government doesn't support expansion of Siberut Biosphere Reserve for all island. There is understanding difference and exploiting of Biosphere Reserve according to the Government with MAB-UNESCO so do with perception there are difference between publics Siberut with the Government. Local public assumes that forest Siberut is custom forest which its the domination stays at custom public according to custom Arat Sabulungan, where its the exploiting and management is done based on custom, but the Government considers to be state forest. Implementation of Siberut Biosphere Reserve Pledge based on Indicator Implementation released by Unesco, 1996 till now still uncommitting for overall of area Biosphere Reserve, except to of Core area (Siberut National Park). Implementation at core area based on Indicator Implementation (Unesco, 1996) mostly has been executed, except for Indikator 5,6,8,9 and 16. Role and influence MAB and TNS in Siberut still be low for the reason need to be improved. \\nKeyword: Cagar Biosfer Siberut, Siberut Biosphere Reserve. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":422146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Andalasian International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences (AIJANS)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Andalasian International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences (AIJANS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25077/aijans.v2.i02.21-36.2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andalasian International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences (AIJANS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/aijans.v2.i02.21-36.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究在被联合国教科文组织指定为生物圈保护区的西伯利亚岛进行。研究的目的是确定在西伯利亚已经规定的政策,了解管理的实施,了解公众的感知和参与,以及了解参与管理生物圈保护区的各方的互动。采用的方法是政策的清单和内容分析,交叉检查的深度访谈,描述性定性的开放式访谈和清单和利益相关者分析。印度尼西亚共和国政府不支持在全岛扩大西比路生物圈保护区。根据政府与MAB-UNESCO的说法,对生物圈保护区的理解和开发存在差异,公众与政府之间的看法也存在差异。当地公众认为森林西伯利亚是海关森林,按照海关Arat Sabulungan的规定,其支配权停留在海关公共,其开发和管理是根据海关进行的,但政府认为是国有森林。根据联合国教科文组织1996年发布的指标执行情况实施西伯利亚生物圈保护区承诺到目前为止,除核心区(西伯利亚国家公园)外,整个地区的生物圈保护区仍未做出承诺。除指标5、6、8、9和16外,根据指标执行情况(教科文组织,1996年)在核心领域的执行大部分已经执行。MAB和TNS在西伯利亚的作用和影响仍然较低,需要进一步提高。关键词:西伯利亚加加尔生物圈;西伯利亚生物圈保护区;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MANAGEMENT POLICY ANALYSIS OF SIBERUT BIOSPHERE RESERVE MENTAWAI ARCHEPELAGO DISTRIC WEST SUMATERA PROVINCE
This research executed in Siberut island which has been specified Unesco as Biosphere Reserve. The purpose of research was to identify the policy which has been specified in Siberut, knows implementation of management, knows perception and participation of public and knows interaction of the parties involving in management Biosphere Reserve. Method applied is Inventory and contents analysis of policy, Indepth Interview with cross check, Open interview with descriptive qualitative and Inventory and Stakeholder analysis. Republic of Indonesia Government doesn't support expansion of Siberut Biosphere Reserve for all island. There is understanding difference and exploiting of Biosphere Reserve according to the Government with MAB-UNESCO so do with perception there are difference between publics Siberut with the Government. Local public assumes that forest Siberut is custom forest which its the domination stays at custom public according to custom Arat Sabulungan, where its the exploiting and management is done based on custom, but the Government considers to be state forest. Implementation of Siberut Biosphere Reserve Pledge based on Indicator Implementation released by Unesco, 1996 till now still uncommitting for overall of area Biosphere Reserve, except to of Core area (Siberut National Park). Implementation at core area based on Indicator Implementation (Unesco, 1996) mostly has been executed, except for Indikator 5,6,8,9 and 16. Role and influence MAB and TNS in Siberut still be low for the reason need to be improved. Keyword: Cagar Biosfer Siberut, Siberut Biosphere Reserve.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信