公法与私法学说的趋同——以公共合同为例

J. McLean
{"title":"公法与私法学说的趋同——以公共合同为例","authors":"J. McLean","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2690935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it possible for public and private law doctrines to converge in response to contemporary modes of mixed public-private governance? Such an approach has certain attractions. It side-steps difficult and often circular a priori assessments of whether a transaction or body is sufficiently “public” or “commercial”, and it sometimes provides a space in which the countervailing threats of public corruption and private coercion can be weighed. Three examples of modern convergence are identified in relation to public contracts: the law of public tendering; controls on contractual discretion; and the concept of non-delegable duties in tort law which impacts on contracting out.","PeriodicalId":180020,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convergence in Public and Private Law Doctrines - The Case of Public Contracts\",\"authors\":\"J. McLean\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2690935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is it possible for public and private law doctrines to converge in response to contemporary modes of mixed public-private governance? Such an approach has certain attractions. It side-steps difficult and often circular a priori assessments of whether a transaction or body is sufficiently “public” or “commercial”, and it sometimes provides a space in which the countervailing threats of public corruption and private coercion can be weighed. Three examples of modern convergence are identified in relation to public contracts: the law of public tendering; controls on contractual discretion; and the concept of non-delegable duties in tort law which impacts on contracting out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2690935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2690935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

公法和私法理论是否有可能趋同,以应对当代公私混合治理模式?这种方法有一定的吸引力。它回避了对交易或机构是否足够“公共”或“商业”的困难且往往是循环的先验评估,有时它提供了一个空间,可以权衡公共腐败和私人胁迫的反抵消威胁。在公共合同方面确定了三个现代趋同的例子:公开招标法;控制合同自由裁量权;以及侵权法中不可委托义务的概念对外包的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Convergence in Public and Private Law Doctrines - The Case of Public Contracts
Is it possible for public and private law doctrines to converge in response to contemporary modes of mixed public-private governance? Such an approach has certain attractions. It side-steps difficult and often circular a priori assessments of whether a transaction or body is sufficiently “public” or “commercial”, and it sometimes provides a space in which the countervailing threats of public corruption and private coercion can be weighed. Three examples of modern convergence are identified in relation to public contracts: the law of public tendering; controls on contractual discretion; and the concept of non-delegable duties in tort law which impacts on contracting out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信