在IPF上比较和对比商用OLTP工作负载和CPU2000

J. Rupley, M. Annavaram, John DeVale, T. Diep, B. Black
{"title":"在IPF上比较和对比商用OLTP工作负载和CPU2000","authors":"J. Rupley, M. Annavaram, John DeVale, T. Diep, B. Black","doi":"10.1109/WWC.2002.1226493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the recent introduction of Itanium Processor Family (IPF) microprocessors for enterprise servers it is imperative to understand the behavior of server class applications. This paper analyzes the behavior of the Oracle Database Benchmark (ODB), an online transaction processing (OLTP) workload, and compares it with SPEC CPU2000. This study examines code mix, instruction and data supply, and value locality. The results show that while IPF's bundle constraints cause a large injection of NOPs into the code stream, IPFs register stack engine successfully reduces the number of memory operations by nearly 50%. The control-flow predictability of ODB is better than CPU2000, in spite of ODB's large active branch footprint. Due to ODB's large memory footprint, cache misses (particularly instruction cache misses) are a much more serious problem than in CPU2000.","PeriodicalId":320576,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE International Workshop on Workload Characterization","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing and contrasting a commercial OLTP workload with CPU2000 on IPF\",\"authors\":\"J. Rupley, M. Annavaram, John DeVale, T. Diep, B. Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WWC.2002.1226493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the recent introduction of Itanium Processor Family (IPF) microprocessors for enterprise servers it is imperative to understand the behavior of server class applications. This paper analyzes the behavior of the Oracle Database Benchmark (ODB), an online transaction processing (OLTP) workload, and compares it with SPEC CPU2000. This study examines code mix, instruction and data supply, and value locality. The results show that while IPF's bundle constraints cause a large injection of NOPs into the code stream, IPFs register stack engine successfully reduces the number of memory operations by nearly 50%. The control-flow predictability of ODB is better than CPU2000, in spite of ODB's large active branch footprint. Due to ODB's large memory footprint, cache misses (particularly instruction cache misses) are a much more serious problem than in CPU2000.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2002 IEEE International Workshop on Workload Characterization\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2002 IEEE International Workshop on Workload Characterization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WWC.2002.1226493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE International Workshop on Workload Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WWC.2002.1226493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着最近为企业服务器引入的Itanium处理器家族(IPF)微处理器,理解服务器类应用程序的行为变得势在必行。本文分析了联机事务处理(OLTP)工作负载Oracle Database Benchmark (ODB)的行为,并将其与SPEC CPU2000进行了比较。本研究检视程式码组合、指令与资料提供,以及价值的局部性。结果表明,虽然IPF的捆绑约束导致大量nop注入到码流中,但IPF的寄存器堆栈引擎成功地将内存操作数量减少了近50%。ODB的控制流可预测性优于CPU2000,尽管ODB的活动分支占用空间很大。由于ODB的内存占用很大,缓存丢失(特别是指令缓存丢失)是一个比CPU2000严重得多的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing and contrasting a commercial OLTP workload with CPU2000 on IPF
With the recent introduction of Itanium Processor Family (IPF) microprocessors for enterprise servers it is imperative to understand the behavior of server class applications. This paper analyzes the behavior of the Oracle Database Benchmark (ODB), an online transaction processing (OLTP) workload, and compares it with SPEC CPU2000. This study examines code mix, instruction and data supply, and value locality. The results show that while IPF's bundle constraints cause a large injection of NOPs into the code stream, IPFs register stack engine successfully reduces the number of memory operations by nearly 50%. The control-flow predictability of ODB is better than CPU2000, in spite of ODB's large active branch footprint. Due to ODB's large memory footprint, cache misses (particularly instruction cache misses) are a much more serious problem than in CPU2000.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信