J. Kim, Jung-Joo Kim, Kyu-Ok Lee, C. Lee, Jong-Ho Lee, Dong‐Seok Kim, Nam-Joo Kim, K. Yoo
{"title":"砷磷掺杂对多晶硅电阻器噪声和TCR的影响","authors":"J. Kim, Jung-Joo Kim, Kyu-Ok Lee, C. Lee, Jong-Ho Lee, Dong‐Seok Kim, Nam-Joo Kim, K. Yoo","doi":"10.1109/SIRF.2012.6160161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flicker (1/f) noise and TCR are compared for arsenic- and phosphorus-doped polysilicon in a 0.18 μm CMOS base technology. Resistors implanted with arsenic exhibit about 4 times higher noise than with phosphorus at the same dose and thermal budget. The TCR of arsenic-doped polysilicon is negative, near -1065 ppm/K, while that of phosphorus-doped resistors positive, about + 590 ppm/K. The mismatch of N-channel MOSFETs with arsenic-doped gates is about 40% lower than with phosphorus gates. The results are attributed to the difference in grain-size and dopant segregation. The difference in grain size is confirmed by TEM and SEM micrographs.","PeriodicalId":339730,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 12th Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of arsenic and phosphorus doping on polysilicon resistor noise and TCR\",\"authors\":\"J. Kim, Jung-Joo Kim, Kyu-Ok Lee, C. Lee, Jong-Ho Lee, Dong‐Seok Kim, Nam-Joo Kim, K. Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIRF.2012.6160161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Flicker (1/f) noise and TCR are compared for arsenic- and phosphorus-doped polysilicon in a 0.18 μm CMOS base technology. Resistors implanted with arsenic exhibit about 4 times higher noise than with phosphorus at the same dose and thermal budget. The TCR of arsenic-doped polysilicon is negative, near -1065 ppm/K, while that of phosphorus-doped resistors positive, about + 590 ppm/K. The mismatch of N-channel MOSFETs with arsenic-doped gates is about 40% lower than with phosphorus gates. The results are attributed to the difference in grain-size and dopant segregation. The difference in grain size is confirmed by TEM and SEM micrographs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE 12th Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE 12th Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIRF.2012.6160161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 12th Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIRF.2012.6160161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of arsenic and phosphorus doping on polysilicon resistor noise and TCR
Flicker (1/f) noise and TCR are compared for arsenic- and phosphorus-doped polysilicon in a 0.18 μm CMOS base technology. Resistors implanted with arsenic exhibit about 4 times higher noise than with phosphorus at the same dose and thermal budget. The TCR of arsenic-doped polysilicon is negative, near -1065 ppm/K, while that of phosphorus-doped resistors positive, about + 590 ppm/K. The mismatch of N-channel MOSFETs with arsenic-doped gates is about 40% lower than with phosphorus gates. The results are attributed to the difference in grain-size and dopant segregation. The difference in grain size is confirmed by TEM and SEM micrographs.