系统统一.康德的《评论与判词》她对费希特的接纳

G. Zöller
{"title":"系统统一.康德的《评论与判词》她对费希特的接纳","authors":"G. Zöller","doi":"10.7203/rek.8.1.26062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contribution confronts Kant’s system-architectonic self-interpretation in the Introduction of the Critique of the Power of Judgment with the latter’s system-logical reinterpretation and metacritique by Fichte. The dual focus of the contribution lies on the mediating function of the Critique of the Power of Judgment between the Critique of Pure Reason and the Critique of Practical Reason in Kant and on Fichte’s reading of Kant’s three Critiques as successive presentations of a threefold absolute, to which Fichte opposes his own conception of a predisjunctive, absolute unity of being and consciousness under the guise of knowledge, reason or logos.","PeriodicalId":153284,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Kantianos","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematische Einheit. Kants Einleitung in die Kritik der Urteilskraft und ihre Rezeption bei Fichte\",\"authors\":\"G. Zöller\",\"doi\":\"10.7203/rek.8.1.26062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The contribution confronts Kant’s system-architectonic self-interpretation in the Introduction of the Critique of the Power of Judgment with the latter’s system-logical reinterpretation and metacritique by Fichte. The dual focus of the contribution lies on the mediating function of the Critique of the Power of Judgment between the Critique of Pure Reason and the Critique of Practical Reason in Kant and on Fichte’s reading of Kant’s three Critiques as successive presentations of a threefold absolute, to which Fichte opposes his own conception of a predisjunctive, absolute unity of being and consciousness under the guise of knowledge, reason or logos.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios Kantianos\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios Kantianos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7203/rek.8.1.26062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Kantianos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/rek.8.1.26062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一贡献将康德在《判断力批判》导论中的系统架构自我解释与费希特对后者的系统逻辑重新解释和元评论进行了对比。这一贡献的双重焦点在于《判断力批判》在康德的《纯粹理性批判》和《实践理性批判》之间的中介作用,以及费希特将康德的三部《批判》解读为三重绝对的连续呈现,费希特反对他自己的概念,即在知识、理性或逻各斯的幌子下存在和意识的先验、绝对统一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematische Einheit. Kants Einleitung in die Kritik der Urteilskraft und ihre Rezeption bei Fichte
The contribution confronts Kant’s system-architectonic self-interpretation in the Introduction of the Critique of the Power of Judgment with the latter’s system-logical reinterpretation and metacritique by Fichte. The dual focus of the contribution lies on the mediating function of the Critique of the Power of Judgment between the Critique of Pure Reason and the Critique of Practical Reason in Kant and on Fichte’s reading of Kant’s three Critiques as successive presentations of a threefold absolute, to which Fichte opposes his own conception of a predisjunctive, absolute unity of being and consciousness under the guise of knowledge, reason or logos.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信