新生儿实际出生体重与超声影像的比较及胎儿出生体重的临床评估:一项前瞻性研究

Sangeeta Gurung, J. Shrestha, E. Gauchan, A. Subedi, A. Shrestha, Sudikshya Thapa
{"title":"新生儿实际出生体重与超声影像的比较及胎儿出生体重的临床评估:一项前瞻性研究","authors":"Sangeeta Gurung, J. Shrestha, E. Gauchan, A. Subedi, A. Shrestha, Sudikshya Thapa","doi":"10.3126/njr.v12i1.46796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Determination of fetal weight is important for the management during labour and delivery. It helps in determining the mode of delivery and aids in diagnosing low birth weight, macrosomia, and intrauterine growth restriction fetus. Ultrasound may not be available in under-resourced settings. Therefore, it is important to study the accuracy of clinical estimation of fetal weight with the sonographic and actual birth weight. \nMethods: One hundred and fifty women fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. Clinical estimation of fetal weight was done by using the Johnson formula. Then the women were subjected to ultrasound. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight was done by the Hadlock method. The two estimated fetal weights were then compared with the actual birth weight. Data were analyzed using SPSS (VERSION 16). \nResults: Actual birth weight has a strong correlation with the ultrasonographic birth weight (p=0.01). However, the clinical birth weight estimation was less correlating to the actual birth weight (p=0.638) \nConclusion: The ultrasound method is better in determining the actual birth weight as compared to the clinical method. Hence, ultrasound has to be recommended whenever available.","PeriodicalId":178516,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Journal of Radiology","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Actual Birth Weight with the Ultrasonographic and Clinical Estimation of Fetal Birth Weight: A Prospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Sangeeta Gurung, J. Shrestha, E. Gauchan, A. Subedi, A. Shrestha, Sudikshya Thapa\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/njr.v12i1.46796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Determination of fetal weight is important for the management during labour and delivery. It helps in determining the mode of delivery and aids in diagnosing low birth weight, macrosomia, and intrauterine growth restriction fetus. Ultrasound may not be available in under-resourced settings. Therefore, it is important to study the accuracy of clinical estimation of fetal weight with the sonographic and actual birth weight. \\nMethods: One hundred and fifty women fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. Clinical estimation of fetal weight was done by using the Johnson formula. Then the women were subjected to ultrasound. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight was done by the Hadlock method. The two estimated fetal weights were then compared with the actual birth weight. Data were analyzed using SPSS (VERSION 16). \\nResults: Actual birth weight has a strong correlation with the ultrasonographic birth weight (p=0.01). However, the clinical birth weight estimation was less correlating to the actual birth weight (p=0.638) \\nConclusion: The ultrasound method is better in determining the actual birth weight as compared to the clinical method. Hence, ultrasound has to be recommended whenever available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nepalese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nepalese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/njr.v12i1.46796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/njr.v12i1.46796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胎儿体重的测定对分娩和分娩过程中的管理很重要。它有助于确定分娩方式,并有助于诊断低出生体重、巨大儿和宫内生长受限胎儿。在资源不足的地区,超声波可能无法使用。因此,研究超声和实际出生体重在临床估计胎儿体重的准确性具有重要意义。方法:150名符合纳入标准的妇女入组研究。胎儿体重的临床估计采用约翰逊公式。然后对这些女性进行超声波检查。胎儿体重的超声估计是用Hadlock方法完成的。然后将这两个估计的胎儿体重与实际出生体重进行比较。数据分析采用SPSS (VERSION 16)软件。结果:新生儿实际出生体重与超声产儿出生体重有较强的相关性(p=0.01)。而新生儿临床出生体重估计值与实际出生体重的相关性较低(p=0.638)。结论:超声法测定新生儿实际出生体重优于临床方法。因此,只要有条件,就推荐使用超声波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Actual Birth Weight with the Ultrasonographic and Clinical Estimation of Fetal Birth Weight: A Prospective Study
Introduction: Determination of fetal weight is important for the management during labour and delivery. It helps in determining the mode of delivery and aids in diagnosing low birth weight, macrosomia, and intrauterine growth restriction fetus. Ultrasound may not be available in under-resourced settings. Therefore, it is important to study the accuracy of clinical estimation of fetal weight with the sonographic and actual birth weight. Methods: One hundred and fifty women fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. Clinical estimation of fetal weight was done by using the Johnson formula. Then the women were subjected to ultrasound. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight was done by the Hadlock method. The two estimated fetal weights were then compared with the actual birth weight. Data were analyzed using SPSS (VERSION 16). Results: Actual birth weight has a strong correlation with the ultrasonographic birth weight (p=0.01). However, the clinical birth weight estimation was less correlating to the actual birth weight (p=0.638) Conclusion: The ultrasound method is better in determining the actual birth weight as compared to the clinical method. Hence, ultrasound has to be recommended whenever available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信