PROAASEL:基于前景理论的连续认证属性选择模型

U. Premarathne
{"title":"PROAASEL:基于前景理论的连续认证属性选择模型","authors":"U. Premarathne","doi":"10.1109/MERCON.2016.7480120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing continuous authentication models use a fixed set of attributes and do not consider the application specific requirements and associated vulnerabilities in their selection. Selecting appropriate attributes for continuous authentication is essentially a multi-criteria decision making process. Existing multi-criteria decision making models are less competent in providing a preference for each attribute in a set of possible attributes. In this paper we propose a utility based approach: PROAASEL, prospect theory based continuous authentication attribute selection model. The main assumption of our approach is the associated risks for each attribute are pre-defined in terms of known vulnerabilities. The main advantage of our model is the ability to select the attributes based on application specific risk characterizations. We have evaluated PROAASEL using CVE data from [1]. Furthermore, we compared the selection method with existing MCDM techniques TOPSIS and N-model for plausible application scenarios. The results reveal that PROAASEL is more expressive and offer more reliable selection when the associated risks are fixed.","PeriodicalId":184790,"journal":{"name":"2016 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROAASEL: Prospect theory based continuous authentication attribute selection model\",\"authors\":\"U. Premarathne\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MERCON.2016.7480120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing continuous authentication models use a fixed set of attributes and do not consider the application specific requirements and associated vulnerabilities in their selection. Selecting appropriate attributes for continuous authentication is essentially a multi-criteria decision making process. Existing multi-criteria decision making models are less competent in providing a preference for each attribute in a set of possible attributes. In this paper we propose a utility based approach: PROAASEL, prospect theory based continuous authentication attribute selection model. The main assumption of our approach is the associated risks for each attribute are pre-defined in terms of known vulnerabilities. The main advantage of our model is the ability to select the attributes based on application specific risk characterizations. We have evaluated PROAASEL using CVE data from [1]. Furthermore, we compared the selection method with existing MCDM techniques TOPSIS and N-model for plausible application scenarios. The results reveal that PROAASEL is more expressive and offer more reliable selection when the associated risks are fixed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCON.2016.7480120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCON.2016.7480120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的连续身份验证模型使用一组固定的属性,并且在选择时不考虑特定于应用程序的需求和相关的漏洞。为持续身份验证选择适当的属性本质上是一个多标准决策过程。现有的多标准决策模型在为一组可能属性中的每个属性提供首选项方面能力较差。本文提出了一种基于效用的方法:PROAASEL,即基于前景理论的连续认证属性选择模型。我们的方法的主要假设是,每个属性的相关风险都是根据已知的漏洞预先定义的。我们模型的主要优点是能够根据特定于应用程序的风险特征选择属性。我们使用[1]的CVE数据对PROAASEL进行了评估。此外,我们将选择方法与现有的MCDM技术TOPSIS和n模型进行了比较,以确定合理的应用场景。结果表明,当相关风险固定时,PROAASEL具有更强的表达能力和更可靠的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PROAASEL: Prospect theory based continuous authentication attribute selection model
Existing continuous authentication models use a fixed set of attributes and do not consider the application specific requirements and associated vulnerabilities in their selection. Selecting appropriate attributes for continuous authentication is essentially a multi-criteria decision making process. Existing multi-criteria decision making models are less competent in providing a preference for each attribute in a set of possible attributes. In this paper we propose a utility based approach: PROAASEL, prospect theory based continuous authentication attribute selection model. The main assumption of our approach is the associated risks for each attribute are pre-defined in terms of known vulnerabilities. The main advantage of our model is the ability to select the attributes based on application specific risk characterizations. We have evaluated PROAASEL using CVE data from [1]. Furthermore, we compared the selection method with existing MCDM techniques TOPSIS and N-model for plausible application scenarios. The results reveal that PROAASEL is more expressive and offer more reliable selection when the associated risks are fixed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信