用于食品中总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌计数的干燥可再水化薄膜:合作研究。

M S Curiale, T Sons, D McIver, J S McAllister, B Halsey, D Roblee, T L Fox
{"title":"用于食品中总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌计数的干燥可再水化薄膜:合作研究。","authors":"M S Curiale,&nbsp;T Sons,&nbsp;D McIver,&nbsp;J S McAllister,&nbsp;B Halsey,&nbsp;D Roblee,&nbsp;T L Fox","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rehydratable dry-film plating methods for total coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods have been compared to the AOAC most probable number methods. Fourteen laboratories participated in the collaborative study. Three coliform and E. coli levels in 6 samples of 4 product types (flour, nuts, cheese, and beef with gravy) and in 3 samples of 2 product types (mushrooms and raw turkey) were tested in duplicate by the participants. The mean log counts for the 3 methods were comparable. In general, the repeatability and reproducibility variances of the plating methods were as good as or better than that of the MPN method. The method has been adopted official first action by AOAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"74 4","pages":"635-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dry rehydratable film for enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods: collaborative study.\",\"authors\":\"M S Curiale,&nbsp;T Sons,&nbsp;D McIver,&nbsp;J S McAllister,&nbsp;B Halsey,&nbsp;D Roblee,&nbsp;T L Fox\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rehydratable dry-film plating methods for total coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods have been compared to the AOAC most probable number methods. Fourteen laboratories participated in the collaborative study. Three coliform and E. coli levels in 6 samples of 4 product types (flour, nuts, cheese, and beef with gravy) and in 3 samples of 2 product types (mushrooms and raw turkey) were tested in duplicate by the participants. The mean log counts for the 3 methods were comparable. In general, the repeatability and reproducibility variances of the plating methods were as good as or better than that of the MPN method. The method has been adopted official first action by AOAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists\",\"volume\":\"74 4\",\"pages\":\"635-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对食品中总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的可再水化干膜镀法与AOAC最可能数法进行了比较。14个实验室参与了合作研究。参与者对4种产品(面粉、坚果、奶酪和肉汁牛肉)的6个样品和2种产品(蘑菇和生火鸡)的3个样品中的3种大肠菌群和大肠杆菌水平进行了重复测试。3种方法的平均对数计数具有可比性。总的来说,电镀方法的重复性和再现性差异与MPN方法一样好或更好。该方法已被AOAC正式采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dry rehydratable film for enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods: collaborative study.

Rehydratable dry-film plating methods for total coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods have been compared to the AOAC most probable number methods. Fourteen laboratories participated in the collaborative study. Three coliform and E. coli levels in 6 samples of 4 product types (flour, nuts, cheese, and beef with gravy) and in 3 samples of 2 product types (mushrooms and raw turkey) were tested in duplicate by the participants. The mean log counts for the 3 methods were comparable. In general, the repeatability and reproducibility variances of the plating methods were as good as or better than that of the MPN method. The method has been adopted official first action by AOAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信