人机交互的形式化方法:比较、利益、开放性问题

F. Paternò, G. Abowd, Philippe A. Palanque
{"title":"人机交互的形式化方法:比较、利益、开放性问题","authors":"F. Paternò, G. Abowd, Philippe A. Palanque","doi":"10.1145/257089.257417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to have a more focused discussion a specific case study has been selected and it will be used to compare the various approaches proposed. This case study is the specification of a subset of the functionality of a NetScapelike browser and a html page server. The proposals will have to answer a set of questions such as: can you verify usability properties on your specification? How difficult is it to translate your specification into an implementation? What kind of constructs do you use in order to structure your specification? Designers should consider issues such as: history of the performed interactions, browsability of the user interface (i.e. the use of links), non-preemptive behaviour, effective and continuous feedback about the current state of interactions.","PeriodicalId":281135,"journal":{"name":"Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal methods in computer human interaction: comparison, benefits, open questions\",\"authors\":\"F. Paternò, G. Abowd, Philippe A. Palanque\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/257089.257417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to have a more focused discussion a specific case study has been selected and it will be used to compare the various approaches proposed. This case study is the specification of a subset of the functionality of a NetScapelike browser and a html page server. The proposals will have to answer a set of questions such as: can you verify usability properties on your specification? How difficult is it to translate your specification into an implementation? What kind of constructs do you use in order to structure your specification? Designers should consider issues such as: history of the performed interactions, browsability of the user interface (i.e. the use of links), non-preemptive behaviour, effective and continuous feedback about the current state of interactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/257089.257417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/257089.257417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了进行更集中的讨论,选择了一个具体的案例研究,并将使用它来比较所提出的各种方法。本案例研究是类netscape浏览器和html页面服务器功能子集的规范。提案必须回答一系列问题,例如:您能否验证规范中的可用性属性?将您的规范转换为实现有多难?您使用什么样的结构来构建您的规范?设计师应该考虑如下问题:执行交互的历史,用户界面的可浏览性(即链接的使用),非抢占性行为,关于交互当前状态的有效和持续的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formal methods in computer human interaction: comparison, benefits, open questions
In order to have a more focused discussion a specific case study has been selected and it will be used to compare the various approaches proposed. This case study is the specification of a subset of the functionality of a NetScapelike browser and a html page server. The proposals will have to answer a set of questions such as: can you verify usability properties on your specification? How difficult is it to translate your specification into an implementation? What kind of constructs do you use in order to structure your specification? Designers should consider issues such as: history of the performed interactions, browsability of the user interface (i.e. the use of links), non-preemptive behaviour, effective and continuous feedback about the current state of interactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信