对产品线的安全演化进行推理的一系列理论

Leopoldo Teixeira, Vander Alves, Paulo Borba, Rohit Gheyi
{"title":"对产品线的安全演化进行推理的一系列理论","authors":"Leopoldo Teixeira, Vander Alves, Paulo Borba, Rohit Gheyi","doi":"10.1145/2791060.2791105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A product line refinement theory formalizes safe evolution in terms of a refinement notion, which does not rely on particular languages for the elements that constitute a product line. Based on this theory, we can derive refinement templates to support safe evolution scenarios. To do so, we need to provide formalizations for particular languages, to specify and prove the templates. Without a systematic approach, this leads to many similar templates and thus repetitive verification tasks. We investigate and explore similarities between these concrete languages, which ultimately results in a product line of theories, where different languages correspond to features, and products correspond to theory instantiations. This also leads to specifying refinement templates at a higher abstraction level, which, in the long run, reduces the specification and proof effort, and also provides the benefits of reusing such templates for additional languages plugged into the theory. We use the Prototype Verification System to encode and prove soundness of the theories and their instantiations. Moreover, we also use the refinement theory to reason about safe evolution of the proposed product line of theories.","PeriodicalId":339158,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A product line of theories for reasoning about safe evolution of product lines\",\"authors\":\"Leopoldo Teixeira, Vander Alves, Paulo Borba, Rohit Gheyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2791060.2791105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A product line refinement theory formalizes safe evolution in terms of a refinement notion, which does not rely on particular languages for the elements that constitute a product line. Based on this theory, we can derive refinement templates to support safe evolution scenarios. To do so, we need to provide formalizations for particular languages, to specify and prove the templates. Without a systematic approach, this leads to many similar templates and thus repetitive verification tasks. We investigate and explore similarities between these concrete languages, which ultimately results in a product line of theories, where different languages correspond to features, and products correspond to theory instantiations. This also leads to specifying refinement templates at a higher abstraction level, which, in the long run, reduces the specification and proof effort, and also provides the benefits of reusing such templates for additional languages plugged into the theory. We use the Prototype Verification System to encode and prove soundness of the theories and their instantiations. Moreover, we also use the refinement theory to reason about safe evolution of the proposed product line of theories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2791060.2791105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2791060.2791105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

产品线细化理论根据细化概念形式化了安全演进,它不依赖于构成产品线的元素的特定语言。基于这一理论,我们可以派生出支持安全进化场景的细化模板。为此,我们需要为特定语言提供形式化,以指定和证明模板。如果没有系统的方法,这将导致许多相似的模板,从而导致重复的验证任务。我们调查和探索这些具体语言之间的相似性,最终形成理论产品线,其中不同的语言对应于特征,产品对应于理论实例。这也导致在更高的抽象级别上指定细化模板,从长远来看,这减少了规范和证明工作,并且还提供了为插入到理论中的其他语言重用此类模板的好处。我们使用原型验证系统来编码和证明理论及其实例的合理性。此外,我们还运用精细化理论对所提出的理论产品线的安全演化进行了推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A product line of theories for reasoning about safe evolution of product lines
A product line refinement theory formalizes safe evolution in terms of a refinement notion, which does not rely on particular languages for the elements that constitute a product line. Based on this theory, we can derive refinement templates to support safe evolution scenarios. To do so, we need to provide formalizations for particular languages, to specify and prove the templates. Without a systematic approach, this leads to many similar templates and thus repetitive verification tasks. We investigate and explore similarities between these concrete languages, which ultimately results in a product line of theories, where different languages correspond to features, and products correspond to theory instantiations. This also leads to specifying refinement templates at a higher abstraction level, which, in the long run, reduces the specification and proof effort, and also provides the benefits of reusing such templates for additional languages plugged into the theory. We use the Prototype Verification System to encode and prove soundness of the theories and their instantiations. Moreover, we also use the refinement theory to reason about safe evolution of the proposed product line of theories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信