用ALGOL 68中的插图说明LL与LR解析

Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference Pub Date : 1977-06-01 DOI:10.1145/800238.807142

R. Hunter, A. McGettrick, R. Patel

{"title":"用ALGOL 68中的插图说明LL与LR解析","authors":"R. Hunter, A. McGettrick, R. Patel","doi":"10.1145/800238.807142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relative merits of LL and LR parsing methods are compared, particular reference being made to ALGOL 68. The fact that LR methods can be applied to a wider class of languages does not seem to give them a significant advantage in practice.","PeriodicalId":226613,"journal":{"name":"Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LL versus LR parsing with illustrations from ALGOL 68\",\"authors\":\"R. Hunter, A. McGettrick, R. Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800238.807142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relative merits of LL and LR parsing methods are compared, particular reference being made to ALGOL 68. The fact that LR methods can be applied to a wider class of languages does not seem to give them a significant advantage in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800238.807142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800238.807142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

比较了LL和LR两种解析方法的相对优点，特别提到了ALGOL 68。事实上，LR方法可以应用于更广泛的语言类别，但在实践中似乎并没有给它们带来显著的优势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

LL versus LR parsing with illustrations from ALGOL 68

The relative merits of LL and LR parsing methods are compared, particular reference being made to ALGOL 68. The fact that LR methods can be applied to a wider class of languages does not seem to give them a significant advantage in practice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference

自引率

0.00%

发文量