大学机构本体整合:一致性评估方法

Richard Gil, A. Borges, L. Ramos, Leonardo Contreras
{"title":"大学机构本体整合:一致性评估方法","authors":"Richard Gil, A. Borges, L. Ramos, Leonardo Contreras","doi":"10.1109/ASWEC.2008.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge representation for specific dominions through ontologies has received great interest, although it is no yet evident an appropriate integration of sub-dominions that contemplate complementary spaces of interpretation. From ontology of dominion of university institutions developed by the authors, it is tried to improve that supported on integration strategic tools. A methodological variant suggested by APFEL is tested, under the context of FOAM incorporated in protege-PROMPT. This proposal considers the systemic quality cube as a reference framework to determine the proportions to the quality of the process and product of incremental integration when \"adding and/or adapting\" significant semantic and logics, \"from the excellent knowledge\" from the experts. They were taken from other two public ontologies about the similar domains developed by other ones. A partial evaluation of the resulting ontology was made combining technical of validation complemented with the visual interaction experts through a process based on the support-cognitive paradigm.","PeriodicalId":231903,"journal":{"name":"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ontologies Integration for University Institutions: Approach to an Alignment Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Richard Gil, A. Borges, L. Ramos, Leonardo Contreras\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASWEC.2008.45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge representation for specific dominions through ontologies has received great interest, although it is no yet evident an appropriate integration of sub-dominions that contemplate complementary spaces of interpretation. From ontology of dominion of university institutions developed by the authors, it is tried to improve that supported on integration strategic tools. A methodological variant suggested by APFEL is tested, under the context of FOAM incorporated in protege-PROMPT. This proposal considers the systemic quality cube as a reference framework to determine the proportions to the quality of the process and product of incremental integration when \\\"adding and/or adapting\\\" significant semantic and logics, \\\"from the excellent knowledge\\\" from the experts. They were taken from other two public ontologies about the similar domains developed by other ones. A partial evaluation of the resulting ontology was made combining technical of validation complemented with the visual interaction experts through a process based on the support-cognitive paradigm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2008.45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2008.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

通过本体论对特定领域的知识表示已经引起了极大的兴趣,尽管还没有明显的考虑互补解释空间的子领域的适当整合。从作者提出的高校机构主导权本体出发,试图在整合战略工具的支持下对其进行完善。在protege-PROMPT中包含FOAM的背景下,APFEL提出的方法变体进行了测试。该建议将系统质量立方体作为参考框架,以确定在“添加和/或适应”来自专家的“优秀知识”的重要语义和逻辑时,增量集成的过程和产品质量的比例。它们取自另外两个公共本体,这些本体是由其他本体开发的类似领域。通过基于支持-认知范式的过程,结合验证技术和视觉交互专家对生成的本体进行部分评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ontologies Integration for University Institutions: Approach to an Alignment Evaluation
Knowledge representation for specific dominions through ontologies has received great interest, although it is no yet evident an appropriate integration of sub-dominions that contemplate complementary spaces of interpretation. From ontology of dominion of university institutions developed by the authors, it is tried to improve that supported on integration strategic tools. A methodological variant suggested by APFEL is tested, under the context of FOAM incorporated in protege-PROMPT. This proposal considers the systemic quality cube as a reference framework to determine the proportions to the quality of the process and product of incremental integration when "adding and/or adapting" significant semantic and logics, "from the excellent knowledge" from the experts. They were taken from other two public ontologies about the similar domains developed by other ones. A partial evaluation of the resulting ontology was made combining technical of validation complemented with the visual interaction experts through a process based on the support-cognitive paradigm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信