社会主义顾问和“社会主义世界体系”的困境:中苏交流作为几内亚-科纳克里失败的典范,1950-64

Austin Jersild
{"title":"社会主义顾问和“社会主义世界体系”的困境:中苏交流作为几内亚-科纳克里失败的典范,1950-64","authors":"Austin Jersild","doi":"10.1080/13507486.2023.2187762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The dilemmas and tensions of the Sino-Soviet relationship in the 1950s were reproduced in Guinea-Conakry in the 1960s in the era of Decolonization. Socialist advisers brought their ‘Agreements on Scientific and Technical Collaboration’ as well as their socialist assumptions and activities to both China in the 1950s and Guinea-Conakry after 1958. By examining the socialist advisers’ activities, this article reveals that in both cases the advisers were inordinately interested in raw materials and consumer products in a way reminiscent of the colonial heritage. In both China and Guinea-Conakry, advisers were often domineering, generally privileged and sometimes even chauvinist. Instead of taking responsibility for the weaknesses of the socialist system, in both China and West Africa the advisers blamed their southern partners for the deteriorating relationship, and associated them with planning failures, inefficiency, incompetence, ‘demagoguery’ and authoritarian tendencies.","PeriodicalId":151994,"journal":{"name":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socialist advisers and the dilemmas of the ‘socialist world system’: Sino-Soviet exchange as a model for failure in Guinea-Conakry, 1950–64\",\"authors\":\"Austin Jersild\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13507486.2023.2187762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The dilemmas and tensions of the Sino-Soviet relationship in the 1950s were reproduced in Guinea-Conakry in the 1960s in the era of Decolonization. Socialist advisers brought their ‘Agreements on Scientific and Technical Collaboration’ as well as their socialist assumptions and activities to both China in the 1950s and Guinea-Conakry after 1958. By examining the socialist advisers’ activities, this article reveals that in both cases the advisers were inordinately interested in raw materials and consumer products in a way reminiscent of the colonial heritage. In both China and Guinea-Conakry, advisers were often domineering, generally privileged and sometimes even chauvinist. Instead of taking responsibility for the weaknesses of the socialist system, in both China and West Africa the advisers blamed their southern partners for the deteriorating relationship, and associated them with planning failures, inefficiency, incompetence, ‘demagoguery’ and authoritarian tendencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2023.2187762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2023.2187762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

20世纪50年代中苏关系的困境与紧张再现于60年代非殖民化时代的几内亚-科纳克里。社会主义顾问将他们的“科学技术合作协议”以及他们的社会主义设想和活动带到20世纪50年代的中国和1958年后的几内亚-科纳克里。通过考察社会主义顾问的活动,本文揭示了在这两种情况下,顾问都对原材料和消费品非常感兴趣,这让人想起了殖民遗产。在中国和几内亚-科纳克里,顾问们往往专横跋扈,通常享有特权,有时甚至是沙文主义者。在中国和西非,顾问们没有为社会主义制度的弱点承担责任,而是将关系恶化归咎于他们的南方伙伴,并将他们与计划失败、效率低下、无能、“煽动”和威权倾向联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socialist advisers and the dilemmas of the ‘socialist world system’: Sino-Soviet exchange as a model for failure in Guinea-Conakry, 1950–64
ABSTRACT The dilemmas and tensions of the Sino-Soviet relationship in the 1950s were reproduced in Guinea-Conakry in the 1960s in the era of Decolonization. Socialist advisers brought their ‘Agreements on Scientific and Technical Collaboration’ as well as their socialist assumptions and activities to both China in the 1950s and Guinea-Conakry after 1958. By examining the socialist advisers’ activities, this article reveals that in both cases the advisers were inordinately interested in raw materials and consumer products in a way reminiscent of the colonial heritage. In both China and Guinea-Conakry, advisers were often domineering, generally privileged and sometimes even chauvinist. Instead of taking responsibility for the weaknesses of the socialist system, in both China and West Africa the advisers blamed their southern partners for the deteriorating relationship, and associated them with planning failures, inefficiency, incompetence, ‘demagoguery’ and authoritarian tendencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信