世界银行和联合国开发计划署的《1950-2016年不断变化的发展概念》

International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance eJournal Pub Date : 2018-07-17 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3215480

M. J. Peterson

{"title":"世界银行和联合国开发计划署的《1950-2016年不断变化的发展概念》","authors":"M. J. Peterson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3215480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses an keyword-in-context analysis of words and phrases used in the sections of World Bank and UNDP annual reports that discuss general approaches to development to show how the range of considerations deemed relevant to development have expanded over time to include a heavy emphasis on social dimensions and lesser emphases on political and environmental dimensions. It also reveals some differences in emphasis between the two organizations and over time.","PeriodicalId":165404,"journal":{"name":"International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance eJournal","volume":"236 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The World Bank's and UNDP's Changing Conceptions of Development 1950-2016\",\"authors\":\"M. J. Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3215480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses an keyword-in-context analysis of words and phrases used in the sections of World Bank and UNDP annual reports that discuss general approaches to development to show how the range of considerations deemed relevant to development have expanded over time to include a heavy emphasis on social dimensions and lesser emphases on political and environmental dimensions. It also reveals some differences in emphasis between the two organizations and over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"236 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3215480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3215480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对世界银行和开发计划署年度报告中讨论一般发展方法的部分中使用的单词和短语进行了关键字上下文分析，以显示被认为与发展有关的考虑范围如何随着时间的推移而扩大，包括对社会方面的重视和对政治和环境方面的较少重视。它还揭示了两个组织之间和不同时期在重点上的一些差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The World Bank's and UNDP's Changing Conceptions of Development 1950-2016

This paper uses an keyword-in-context analysis of words and phrases used in the sections of World Bank and UNDP annual reports that discuss general approaches to development to show how the range of considerations deemed relevant to development have expanded over time to include a heavy emphasis on social dimensions and lesser emphases on political and environmental dimensions. It also reveals some differences in emphasis between the two organizations and over time.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance eJournal

自引率

0.00%

发文量