电压-时间变换器(VTCs)和电压-频率变换器(vfc)电路的比较研究

Mohammed A. ElGabry, H. Mostafa, A. Soliman
{"title":"电压-时间变换器(VTCs)和电压-频率变换器(vfc)电路的比较研究","authors":"Mohammed A. ElGabry, H. Mostafa, A. Soliman","doi":"10.1109/JEC-ECC.2016.7518959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays ADC becomes more essential in emerging applications. ADC is starting to become hindrance to the system in the performance and the power consumption. For high-speed applications, pipelined and flash ADC has dominantly been used over the past decade. Technology scaling and the focus on digital systems with high-performance offer better time resolution by decreasing the gate delay. If the input analog voltage signal is represented in the form of time or frequency, rather than voltage, we can make use of the scaled technologies, low power consumption and die area. Time based ADC (TADC) is different from conventional ADC, because the signal is represented in the form of a stream of series time events. This architecture places the ADC at the front end to create more complex digital circuits for low power applications, and low voltage design. Simulation results show that Voltage-to-Frequency converter (VFC) circuit is better than Voltage-to-Time converter (VTC) circuit in the sensitivity, signal to noise and distortion ratio, effective number of bits, and maximum input frequency, while VTC is better than VFC with respect to the power consumption. VFC is better to be used with the applications that require high input frequency, while VTC is better to be used in applications that require low power consumption.","PeriodicalId":362288,"journal":{"name":"2016 Fourth International Japan-Egypt Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (JEC-ECC)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of the Voltage-to-Time converters (VTCs) and the Voltage-to-Frequency converters (VFCs) circuits\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed A. ElGabry, H. Mostafa, A. Soliman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JEC-ECC.2016.7518959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays ADC becomes more essential in emerging applications. ADC is starting to become hindrance to the system in the performance and the power consumption. For high-speed applications, pipelined and flash ADC has dominantly been used over the past decade. Technology scaling and the focus on digital systems with high-performance offer better time resolution by decreasing the gate delay. If the input analog voltage signal is represented in the form of time or frequency, rather than voltage, we can make use of the scaled technologies, low power consumption and die area. Time based ADC (TADC) is different from conventional ADC, because the signal is represented in the form of a stream of series time events. This architecture places the ADC at the front end to create more complex digital circuits for low power applications, and low voltage design. Simulation results show that Voltage-to-Frequency converter (VFC) circuit is better than Voltage-to-Time converter (VTC) circuit in the sensitivity, signal to noise and distortion ratio, effective number of bits, and maximum input frequency, while VTC is better than VFC with respect to the power consumption. VFC is better to be used with the applications that require high input frequency, while VTC is better to be used in applications that require low power consumption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":362288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Fourth International Japan-Egypt Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (JEC-ECC)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Fourth International Japan-Egypt Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (JEC-ECC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/JEC-ECC.2016.7518959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Fourth International Japan-Egypt Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (JEC-ECC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JEC-ECC.2016.7518959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

如今,ADC在新兴应用中变得越来越重要。ADC在性能和功耗方面开始成为系统的障碍。对于高速应用,流水线和闪存ADC在过去十年中占据主导地位。技术扩展和对高性能数字系统的关注通过降低门延迟提供更好的时间分辨率。如果输入的模拟电压信号以时间或频率的形式而不是电压的形式表示,我们可以利用缩放技术,低功耗和模具面积。基于时间的ADC (TADC)不同于传统的ADC,因为信号以一系列时间事件流的形式表示。这种架构将ADC置于前端,为低功耗应用和低电压设计创建更复杂的数字电路。仿真结果表明,电压-频率转换器(VFC)电路在灵敏度、信噪比、失真比、有效比特数、最大输入频率等方面优于电压-时间转换器(VTC)电路,而VTC电路在功耗方面优于VFC电路。VFC更适用于输入频率要求高的应用场合,而VTC更适用于功耗要求低的应用场合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of the Voltage-to-Time converters (VTCs) and the Voltage-to-Frequency converters (VFCs) circuits
Nowadays ADC becomes more essential in emerging applications. ADC is starting to become hindrance to the system in the performance and the power consumption. For high-speed applications, pipelined and flash ADC has dominantly been used over the past decade. Technology scaling and the focus on digital systems with high-performance offer better time resolution by decreasing the gate delay. If the input analog voltage signal is represented in the form of time or frequency, rather than voltage, we can make use of the scaled technologies, low power consumption and die area. Time based ADC (TADC) is different from conventional ADC, because the signal is represented in the form of a stream of series time events. This architecture places the ADC at the front end to create more complex digital circuits for low power applications, and low voltage design. Simulation results show that Voltage-to-Frequency converter (VFC) circuit is better than Voltage-to-Time converter (VTC) circuit in the sensitivity, signal to noise and distortion ratio, effective number of bits, and maximum input frequency, while VTC is better than VFC with respect to the power consumption. VFC is better to be used with the applications that require high input frequency, while VTC is better to be used in applications that require low power consumption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信