D. Graham
{"title":"Accommodating Evidence of Traditional Use for Medicines Within Risk-Based Regulation in Australia","authors":"D. Graham","doi":"10.31038/jppr.2021442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For reasons including affordability, accessibility, cultural heritage and health benefits, traditional medicines are still important contributors to health care. As the regulation of medicines becomes increasingly evidence and risk based, regulators have the challenge of dealing with the role of traditional use evidence in assessing the safety and efficacy of traditional medicines. Regulators must protect the consumer while also respecting the rights of consumers to have access as far as possible to medicines of their choice. Evidence for the safety and efficacy of traditionally used medicines is based largely on observation and experience over extended periods, sometimes gained over centuries of use. If Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is used as an example, the evidence has evolved over millennia of use, and is still evolving, and the information is passed on through documentation such as in treatises and the education and training of practitioners (Figure 1).","PeriodicalId":285318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/jppr.2021442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于可负担性、可获得性、文化遗产和健康益处等原因,传统药物仍然是保健的重要贡献者。随着药物监管越来越以证据和风险为基础,监管机构面临的挑战是如何处理传统用途证据在评估传统药物的安全性和有效性方面的作用。监管机构必须保护消费者,同时也尊重消费者尽可能获得自己选择的药物的权利。传统药物的安全性和有效性的证据主要基于长期的观察和经验,有时是经过几个世纪的使用而获得的。如果以中国传统医学(TCM)为例,其证据在数千年的使用中不断发展,并且仍在不断发展,信息通过文献(如论文和从业者的教育和培训)传递(图1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accommodating Evidence of Traditional Use for Medicines Within Risk-Based Regulation in Australia
For reasons including affordability, accessibility, cultural heritage and health benefits, traditional medicines are still important contributors to health care. As the regulation of medicines becomes increasingly evidence and risk based, regulators have the challenge of dealing with the role of traditional use evidence in assessing the safety and efficacy of traditional medicines. Regulators must protect the consumer while also respecting the rights of consumers to have access as far as possible to medicines of their choice. Evidence for the safety and efficacy of traditionally used medicines is based largely on observation and experience over extended periods, sometimes gained over centuries of use. If Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is used as an example, the evidence has evolved over millennia of use, and is still evolving, and the information is passed on through documentation such as in treatises and the education and training of practitioners (Figure 1).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信