推特上的危机沟通:2019年克赖斯特彻奇恐怖袭击的社会网络分析

Hanif Fakhrurroja, Muhammad Nashir Atmaja, Joe Nathan C.G Panjaitan, A. Alamsyah, A. Munandar
{"title":"推特上的危机沟通:2019年克赖斯特彻奇恐怖袭击的社会网络分析","authors":"Hanif Fakhrurroja, Muhammad Nashir Atmaja, Joe Nathan C.G Panjaitan, A. Alamsyah, A. Munandar","doi":"10.1109/ICISS48059.2019.8969839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Christchurch terrorist attack is a recent tragedy that happened in New Zealand on 15 March 2019. There are total 50 deaths caused by the attack in Christchurch. In two days, at least, 722,295 tweets are created by users of Twitter, they tweet about their thoughts and prayers about the attack. That means that social media is very important to spread information throughout the world while in a crisis condition, which also able to provide and facilitate how the information flow. To understand the issue, this paper examines the use of Twitter during post-tragedy, which is 2 days after the tragedy happened in New Zealand. The network structures within the conversation about Christchurch attack must be concerned, because many communities and actors play a part in the flow of information about the attack on Twitter. Our findings show an individual might have more information-spreading power than authority or government institutions. The influence of non-authority actors in Twitter network highlights an apparent reality that an individual might be spread information wider than authority without knowing the righteousness.","PeriodicalId":125643,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crisis Communication on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis of Christchurch Terrorist Attack in 2019\",\"authors\":\"Hanif Fakhrurroja, Muhammad Nashir Atmaja, Joe Nathan C.G Panjaitan, A. Alamsyah, A. Munandar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICISS48059.2019.8969839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Christchurch terrorist attack is a recent tragedy that happened in New Zealand on 15 March 2019. There are total 50 deaths caused by the attack in Christchurch. In two days, at least, 722,295 tweets are created by users of Twitter, they tweet about their thoughts and prayers about the attack. That means that social media is very important to spread information throughout the world while in a crisis condition, which also able to provide and facilitate how the information flow. To understand the issue, this paper examines the use of Twitter during post-tragedy, which is 2 days after the tragedy happened in New Zealand. The network structures within the conversation about Christchurch attack must be concerned, because many communities and actors play a part in the flow of information about the attack on Twitter. Our findings show an individual might have more information-spreading power than authority or government institutions. The influence of non-authority actors in Twitter network highlights an apparent reality that an individual might be spread information wider than authority without knowing the righteousness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS48059.2019.8969839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS48059.2019.8969839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

基督城恐怖袭击是2019年3月15日发生在新西兰的一起近期悲剧。克赖斯特彻奇的袭击共造成50人死亡。在两天内,至少有722,295条推特是由推特用户创建的,他们在推特上表达了他们对袭击的想法和祈祷。这意味着社交媒体在危机情况下在世界范围内传播信息是非常重要的,它也能够提供和促进信息的流动。为了理解这个问题,本文考察了新西兰悲剧发生后2天Twitter的使用情况。关于克赖斯特彻奇袭击的对话中的网络结构必须受到关注,因为许多社区和行动者在Twitter上关于袭击的信息流中发挥了作用。我们的研究结果表明,个人可能比权威机构或政府机构拥有更多的信息传播能力。非权威行动者在推特网络中的影响力凸显了一个明显的现实,即个人在不知道正义的情况下,可能会比权威更广泛地传播信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crisis Communication on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis of Christchurch Terrorist Attack in 2019
Christchurch terrorist attack is a recent tragedy that happened in New Zealand on 15 March 2019. There are total 50 deaths caused by the attack in Christchurch. In two days, at least, 722,295 tweets are created by users of Twitter, they tweet about their thoughts and prayers about the attack. That means that social media is very important to spread information throughout the world while in a crisis condition, which also able to provide and facilitate how the information flow. To understand the issue, this paper examines the use of Twitter during post-tragedy, which is 2 days after the tragedy happened in New Zealand. The network structures within the conversation about Christchurch attack must be concerned, because many communities and actors play a part in the flow of information about the attack on Twitter. Our findings show an individual might have more information-spreading power than authority or government institutions. The influence of non-authority actors in Twitter network highlights an apparent reality that an individual might be spread information wider than authority without knowing the righteousness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信