印度对保护责任(R2P)和人道主义干预的演变观点

India and Global Governance Pub Date : 2022-01-26 DOI:10.4324/9781003272540-8

Kartik Bommakanti

{"title":"印度对保护责任(R2P)和人道主义干预的演变观点","authors":"Kartik Bommakanti","doi":"10.4324/9781003272540-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of legitimacy in India’s approach to the doctrine of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P) and Humanitarian Interventions (HIs)has not received as much attention as it is due. The following article evaluates India’s evolving views on R2P and HIs through the prism of legitimacy.It also demonstrates why the outcome of an HI whether through the medium of the R2P or otherwise matters as much as motives.","PeriodicalId":162792,"journal":{"name":"India and Global Governance","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"India's Evolving Views on Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Humanitarian Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Kartik Bommakanti\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003272540-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The role of legitimacy in India’s approach to the doctrine of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P) and Humanitarian Interventions (HIs)has not received as much attention as it is due. The following article evaluates India’s evolving views on R2P and HIs through the prism of legitimacy.It also demonstrates why the outcome of an HI whether through the medium of the R2P or otherwise matters as much as motives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"India and Global Governance\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"India and Global Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003272540-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India and Global Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003272540-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在印度对待“保护责任”(R2P)和人道主义干预(HIs)原则的态度中，合法性的作用并没有得到应有的重视。下面的文章通过合法性的棱镜来评估印度对R2P和HIs的不断演变的观点。它还说明了为什么HI的结果——无论是通过R2P媒介还是其他方式——与动机同样重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

India's Evolving Views on Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Humanitarian Interventions

The role of legitimacy in India’s approach to the doctrine of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P) and Humanitarian Interventions (HIs)has not received as much attention as it is due. The following article evaluates India’s evolving views on R2P and HIs through the prism of legitimacy.It also demonstrates why the outcome of an HI whether through the medium of the R2P or otherwise matters as much as motives.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

India and Global Governance

自引率

0.00%

发文量