压力累积测试中的延迟响应分析:挑战与解决方案

E. Motaei, A. Ali, M. I. B. Rozali
{"title":"压力累积测试中的延迟响应分析:挑战与解决方案","authors":"E. Motaei, A. Ali, M. I. B. Rozali","doi":"10.2118/214111-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the most important features that impacts the facility size and production rate commitment is the minimum connected volume which can be explored through pressure Build Up and any misinterpretation, costs the operators significantly. This paper aims to address the challenges in Late Time Response analysis of pressure Build up well tests that exploits the reservoir boundary. Knowing that the well test response at late time shows the fingerprint of multiple features such as aquifer, sand discontinuity, baffles, faults, boundaries, etc., it will be challenging to quantify the extends of the reservoir using convolved late response.\n Two main numerical models were built for oil and gas reservoirs in an elongated reservoir to study the lateral boundary features such as closed boundary and aquifer and understand the effect of these features on late time response to get a clearer response. Using two models, the impact of mobility contrast between the hydrocarbon, boundary distance, aquifer strength, boundary movement and structure complexity was simulated.\n The major finding of this paper is that a unit slope straight line can be seen in buildup test which doesn't fit any classical and analytical model for pressure build up as the expectation is to have negative slope and down-ward hump for build up response of closed boundary and aquifer. However, this can be explained through mobility reduction from hydrocarbon (oil/gas) to water. The simulation time (build up test duration) was extended to see the long-term impact theoretically and at the end the same expectation was confirmed by simulation. After radial flow, channel flow (half slope) and then unit slope (mobility reduction) and then at last the drop in the derivative response is observed. However, the drop as signature of aquifer or limited volume happened beyond practical test duration (> 1000 hours).\n The work highlights the true workflow to identify the true response from reservoir and have reliable reservoir characterization and shows the case studies that address the cost on 1) misinterpretation of late time response and 2) excluding the well test from analysis due to its complexity to highlight the value and criticality of the integrated analysis.","PeriodicalId":349960,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, March 14, 2023","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late Time Response Analysis in Pressure Build Up Tests: Challenges and Solutions\",\"authors\":\"E. Motaei, A. Ali, M. I. B. Rozali\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/214111-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n One of the most important features that impacts the facility size and production rate commitment is the minimum connected volume which can be explored through pressure Build Up and any misinterpretation, costs the operators significantly. This paper aims to address the challenges in Late Time Response analysis of pressure Build up well tests that exploits the reservoir boundary. Knowing that the well test response at late time shows the fingerprint of multiple features such as aquifer, sand discontinuity, baffles, faults, boundaries, etc., it will be challenging to quantify the extends of the reservoir using convolved late response.\\n Two main numerical models were built for oil and gas reservoirs in an elongated reservoir to study the lateral boundary features such as closed boundary and aquifer and understand the effect of these features on late time response to get a clearer response. Using two models, the impact of mobility contrast between the hydrocarbon, boundary distance, aquifer strength, boundary movement and structure complexity was simulated.\\n The major finding of this paper is that a unit slope straight line can be seen in buildup test which doesn't fit any classical and analytical model for pressure build up as the expectation is to have negative slope and down-ward hump for build up response of closed boundary and aquifer. However, this can be explained through mobility reduction from hydrocarbon (oil/gas) to water. The simulation time (build up test duration) was extended to see the long-term impact theoretically and at the end the same expectation was confirmed by simulation. After radial flow, channel flow (half slope) and then unit slope (mobility reduction) and then at last the drop in the derivative response is observed. However, the drop as signature of aquifer or limited volume happened beyond practical test duration (> 1000 hours).\\n The work highlights the true workflow to identify the true response from reservoir and have reliable reservoir characterization and shows the case studies that address the cost on 1) misinterpretation of late time response and 2) excluding the well test from analysis due to its complexity to highlight the value and criticality of the integrated analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, March 14, 2023\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, March 14, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/214111-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, March 14, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214111-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

影响设施规模和产量承诺的最重要特征之一是最小连接体积,这可能通过压力累积和任何误解来探索,这给运营商带来了巨大的成本。本文旨在解决开发储层边界的增压试井后期响应分析中的挑战。由于后期试井响应显示了多种特征的指纹,如含水层、砂面、挡板、断层、边界等,因此使用卷积后期响应来量化储层的延伸将是一项挑战。针对拉长型油藏,建立了两种主要的数值模型,研究闭合边界和含水层等侧向边界特征,了解这些特征对后期响应的影响,以获得更清晰的响应。利用两种模型分别模拟了烃类运移对比、边界距离、含水层强度、边界运动和构造复杂性对渗流的影响。本文的主要发现是在堆积试验中可以看到一条单位斜率直线,它不适合任何经典的压力堆积模型和解析模型,因为期望封闭边界和含水层的堆积响应具有负斜率和向下的驼峰。然而,这可以通过从碳氢化合物(油/气)到水的流动性降低来解释。通过延长模拟时间(建立试验持续时间)来观察理论上的长期影响,最后通过仿真验证了相同的期望。在径向流动之后,是通道流动(半坡度),然后是单位坡度(迁移率降低),最后是导数响应下降。然而,作为含水层或有限体积特征的下降发生在实际测试时间(100 - 1000小时)之后。该工作强调了识别油藏真实响应的真实工作流程,并具有可靠的油藏特征,并展示了解决以下问题的案例研究:1)对后期响应的误解;2)由于其复杂性而将试井排除在分析之外,以突出综合分析的价值和重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Late Time Response Analysis in Pressure Build Up Tests: Challenges and Solutions
One of the most important features that impacts the facility size and production rate commitment is the minimum connected volume which can be explored through pressure Build Up and any misinterpretation, costs the operators significantly. This paper aims to address the challenges in Late Time Response analysis of pressure Build up well tests that exploits the reservoir boundary. Knowing that the well test response at late time shows the fingerprint of multiple features such as aquifer, sand discontinuity, baffles, faults, boundaries, etc., it will be challenging to quantify the extends of the reservoir using convolved late response. Two main numerical models were built for oil and gas reservoirs in an elongated reservoir to study the lateral boundary features such as closed boundary and aquifer and understand the effect of these features on late time response to get a clearer response. Using two models, the impact of mobility contrast between the hydrocarbon, boundary distance, aquifer strength, boundary movement and structure complexity was simulated. The major finding of this paper is that a unit slope straight line can be seen in buildup test which doesn't fit any classical and analytical model for pressure build up as the expectation is to have negative slope and down-ward hump for build up response of closed boundary and aquifer. However, this can be explained through mobility reduction from hydrocarbon (oil/gas) to water. The simulation time (build up test duration) was extended to see the long-term impact theoretically and at the end the same expectation was confirmed by simulation. After radial flow, channel flow (half slope) and then unit slope (mobility reduction) and then at last the drop in the derivative response is observed. However, the drop as signature of aquifer or limited volume happened beyond practical test duration (> 1000 hours). The work highlights the true workflow to identify the true response from reservoir and have reliable reservoir characterization and shows the case studies that address the cost on 1) misinterpretation of late time response and 2) excluding the well test from analysis due to its complexity to highlight the value and criticality of the integrated analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信