巴西互联网的公民权利框架:言论自由权与版权保护

Barbara Marchiori de Assis, F. Lancieri
{"title":"巴西互联网的公民权利框架:言论自由权与版权保护","authors":"Barbara Marchiori de Assis, F. Lancieri","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2258584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper defends the adoption, by Brazilian legislation, of safe harbors that exempt online service providers from any civil liability arising from the violation of copyrighted material uploaded by third parties. Such exemption is justified because in the lack thereof, websites would be transformed into censors of what might or not be shared online, undermining the great expansion of freedom of expression rights that were made possible by the Internet. This paper is divided in six different sections. The first introduces the aforementioned theme; the second describes the concept of safe harbor regulations present in the legislation and legal doctrines of different jurisdictions around the world, including the safe harbors now being discussed in Brazil; the third presents case law from the United States, France, Italy, and Germany to discuss how these safe harbors are being interpreted around the world; the fourth presents the way Brazilian tribunals have been deciding matters regarding third party content on the web; the fifth uses the proportionality test applicable in jurisdictions such as Germany and Brazil to justify the establishment of safe harbors; and the sixth briefly concludes what was previously discussed.","PeriodicalId":208710,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Patent Law/Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet: The Right to Freedom of Expression Versus Copyright Protection\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Marchiori de Assis, F. Lancieri\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2258584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper defends the adoption, by Brazilian legislation, of safe harbors that exempt online service providers from any civil liability arising from the violation of copyrighted material uploaded by third parties. Such exemption is justified because in the lack thereof, websites would be transformed into censors of what might or not be shared online, undermining the great expansion of freedom of expression rights that were made possible by the Internet. This paper is divided in six different sections. The first introduces the aforementioned theme; the second describes the concept of safe harbor regulations present in the legislation and legal doctrines of different jurisdictions around the world, including the safe harbors now being discussed in Brazil; the third presents case law from the United States, France, Italy, and Germany to discuss how these safe harbors are being interpreted around the world; the fourth presents the way Brazilian tribunals have been deciding matters regarding third party content on the web; the fifth uses the proportionality test applicable in jurisdictions such as Germany and Brazil to justify the establishment of safe harbors; and the sixth briefly concludes what was previously discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Patent Law/Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Patent Law/Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2258584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Patent Law/Intellectual Property (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2258584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文为巴西立法采用安全港制度辩护,该制度免除网络服务提供商因第三方上传的内容侵犯版权而承担的民事责任。这种豁免是合理的,因为如果没有这种豁免,网站就会变成审查哪些内容可以在网上分享,哪些不可以在网上分享的机构,从而破坏了互联网所带来的言论自由权利的巨大扩展。本文分为六个不同的部分。第一部分介绍了前面提到的主题;第二部分描述了世界各地不同司法管辖区的立法和法律理论中存在的安全港条例的概念,包括巴西目前正在讨论的安全港;第三部分介绍了美国、法国、意大利和德国的判例法,讨论这些安全港在世界各地是如何解释的;第四部分介绍了巴西法庭在网络上裁决第三方内容的方式;第五种是使用适用于德国和巴西等司法管辖区的比例检验来证明建立安全港的合理性;第六章简要总结了之前讨论的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet: The Right to Freedom of Expression Versus Copyright Protection
This paper defends the adoption, by Brazilian legislation, of safe harbors that exempt online service providers from any civil liability arising from the violation of copyrighted material uploaded by third parties. Such exemption is justified because in the lack thereof, websites would be transformed into censors of what might or not be shared online, undermining the great expansion of freedom of expression rights that were made possible by the Internet. This paper is divided in six different sections. The first introduces the aforementioned theme; the second describes the concept of safe harbor regulations present in the legislation and legal doctrines of different jurisdictions around the world, including the safe harbors now being discussed in Brazil; the third presents case law from the United States, France, Italy, and Germany to discuss how these safe harbors are being interpreted around the world; the fourth presents the way Brazilian tribunals have been deciding matters regarding third party content on the web; the fifth uses the proportionality test applicable in jurisdictions such as Germany and Brazil to justify the establishment of safe harbors; and the sixth briefly concludes what was previously discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信