{"title":"企业理论及其批评者:盘点与评估","authors":"Nicolai J. Foss, Peter G. Klein","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.695484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since its emergence in the 1970s the modern economic or Coasian theory of the firm has been discussed and challenged by sociologists, heterodox economists, management scholars, and other critics. This chapter reviews and assesses these critiques, focusing on behavioral issues (bounded rationality and motivation), process (including path dependence and the selection argument), entrepreneurship, and the challenge from knowledge-based theories of the firm.","PeriodicalId":101736,"journal":{"name":"CORI: Contracting & Organizations Research Institute","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"177","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Theory of the Firm and its Critics: A Stocktaking and Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Nicolai J. Foss, Peter G. Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.695484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ever since its emergence in the 1970s the modern economic or Coasian theory of the firm has been discussed and challenged by sociologists, heterodox economists, management scholars, and other critics. This chapter reviews and assesses these critiques, focusing on behavioral issues (bounded rationality and motivation), process (including path dependence and the selection argument), entrepreneurship, and the challenge from knowledge-based theories of the firm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CORI: Contracting & Organizations Research Institute\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"177\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CORI: Contracting & Organizations Research Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.695484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CORI: Contracting & Organizations Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.695484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Theory of the Firm and its Critics: A Stocktaking and Assessment
Ever since its emergence in the 1970s the modern economic or Coasian theory of the firm has been discussed and challenged by sociologists, heterodox economists, management scholars, and other critics. This chapter reviews and assesses these critiques, focusing on behavioral issues (bounded rationality and motivation), process (including path dependence and the selection argument), entrepreneurship, and the challenge from knowledge-based theories of the firm.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
