使用正式的规范来支持基于模型的测试ASDSpec:结合了两种技术中最好的一种工具

van der Ap Arjan Meer, R. Kherrazi, M. Hamilton
{"title":"使用正式的规范来支持基于模型的测试ASDSpec:结合了两种技术中最好的一种工具","authors":"van der Ap Arjan Meer, R. Kherrazi, M. Hamilton","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.141.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formal methods and testing are two important approaches that assist in the development of high quality software. For long time these approaches have been seen as competitors and there was very little interaction between the two communities. In recent years a new consensus has developed in which they are seen as more complementary. In this report we present an approach based on the ASD(Analytical Software Design) suite by Verum and the Microsoft Spec Explorer Model Based Testing(MBT) tool. ASD is a model-based design approach that can produce verified software components that can be combined into complete systems. However, ASD cannot verify existing components, nor complex component interactions involving data transfers. We have developed a tool that allows us to convert ASD models to Spec Explorer, allowing us to do more complete verification of software systems using dynamic testing at little additional cost and effort. We demonstrate this by applying our approach to an industrial-size case study. Keywords: Model Based Testing, Formal Verification, Dynamic Testing, Static Verification, EMF, ASD, Spec Explorer","PeriodicalId":381434,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using formal specifications to support model based testing ASDSpec : a tool combining the best of two techniques\",\"authors\":\"van der Ap Arjan Meer, R. Kherrazi, M. Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.4204/EPTCS.141.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Formal methods and testing are two important approaches that assist in the development of high quality software. For long time these approaches have been seen as competitors and there was very little interaction between the two communities. In recent years a new consensus has developed in which they are seen as more complementary. In this report we present an approach based on the ASD(Analytical Software Design) suite by Verum and the Microsoft Spec Explorer Model Based Testing(MBT) tool. ASD is a model-based design approach that can produce verified software components that can be combined into complete systems. However, ASD cannot verify existing components, nor complex component interactions involving data transfers. We have developed a tool that allows us to convert ASD models to Spec Explorer, allowing us to do more complete verification of software systems using dynamic testing at little additional cost and effort. We demonstrate this by applying our approach to an industrial-size case study. Keywords: Model Based Testing, Formal Verification, Dynamic Testing, Static Verification, EMF, ASD, Spec Explorer\",\"PeriodicalId\":381434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.141.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.141.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

形式化方法和测试是帮助开发高质量软件的两种重要方法。很长一段时间以来,这两种方法都被视为竞争对手,两者之间很少有互动。近年来形成了一种新的协商一致意见,认为它们更具有互补性。在本报告中,我们提出了一种基于Verum的ASD(分析软件设计)套件和Microsoft Spec Explorer基于模型的测试(MBT)工具的方法。ASD是一种基于模型的设计方法,可以产生经过验证的软件组件,这些组件可以组合成完整的系统。然而,ASD不能验证现有的组件,也不能验证涉及数据传输的复杂组件交互。我们已经开发了一个工具,它允许我们将ASD模型转换为Spec Explorer,允许我们在很少的额外成本和努力下使用动态测试对软件系统进行更完整的验证。我们通过将我们的方法应用于一个工业规模的案例研究来证明这一点。关键词:基于模型的测试,形式验证,动态测试,静态验证,EMF, ASD, Spec Explorer
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using formal specifications to support model based testing ASDSpec : a tool combining the best of two techniques
Formal methods and testing are two important approaches that assist in the development of high quality software. For long time these approaches have been seen as competitors and there was very little interaction between the two communities. In recent years a new consensus has developed in which they are seen as more complementary. In this report we present an approach based on the ASD(Analytical Software Design) suite by Verum and the Microsoft Spec Explorer Model Based Testing(MBT) tool. ASD is a model-based design approach that can produce verified software components that can be combined into complete systems. However, ASD cannot verify existing components, nor complex component interactions involving data transfers. We have developed a tool that allows us to convert ASD models to Spec Explorer, allowing us to do more complete verification of software systems using dynamic testing at little additional cost and effort. We demonstrate this by applying our approach to an industrial-size case study. Keywords: Model Based Testing, Formal Verification, Dynamic Testing, Static Verification, EMF, ASD, Spec Explorer
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信