敬业的学者,深思熟虑的实践者:在以用户为中心的设计和可用性中,学者和实践者的相互依存

S. Dray
{"title":"敬业的学者,深思熟虑的实践者:在以用户为中心的设计和可用性中,学者和实践者的相互依存","authors":"S. Dray","doi":"10.4018/978-1-60960-057-0.CH041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our field faces threats to its legitimacy that we will have trouble dealing with if we continue to allow a split between academia and practice. Many academics face obstacles in the way of more \"relevant\" research that would be more meaningful to practitioners, and practitioners tend to see academic research as not relevant to them in reinforcing their professional identity, skills, and legitimacy as the organizational experts in user research. Meanwhile, many practitioners feel they are threatened by a perceived commoditization and co-opting of user-centered design (UCD) and user experience (UX) work. These two trends or tendencies are rarely mentioned together. How they are related, and how we address these issues will have a significant bearing on whether our field will continue to advance or whether it will wither.","PeriodicalId":436443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Usability Studies archive","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaged scholars, thoughtful practitioners: the interdependence of academics and practitioners in user-centered design and usability\",\"authors\":\"S. Dray\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-60960-057-0.CH041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our field faces threats to its legitimacy that we will have trouble dealing with if we continue to allow a split between academia and practice. Many academics face obstacles in the way of more \\\"relevant\\\" research that would be more meaningful to practitioners, and practitioners tend to see academic research as not relevant to them in reinforcing their professional identity, skills, and legitimacy as the organizational experts in user research. Meanwhile, many practitioners feel they are threatened by a perceived commoditization and co-opting of user-centered design (UCD) and user experience (UX) work. These two trends or tendencies are rarely mentioned together. How they are related, and how we address these issues will have a significant bearing on whether our field will continue to advance or whether it will wither.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Usability Studies archive\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Usability Studies archive\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-057-0.CH041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Usability Studies archive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-057-0.CH041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

我们的领域面临着对其合法性的威胁,如果我们继续允许学术界和实践之间的分裂,我们将难以应对这种威胁。许多学者在进行对实践者更有意义的“相关”研究的道路上面临障碍,而实践者往往认为学术研究与他们无关,无法加强他们作为用户研究组织专家的职业身份、技能和合法性。与此同时,许多从业者感到他们受到了商品化的威胁,并被用户中心设计(UCD)和用户体验(UX)工作所取代。这两种趋势很少被同时提到。它们是如何相互关联的,以及我们如何解决这些问题,将对我们的领域是继续发展还是走向衰落产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engaged scholars, thoughtful practitioners: the interdependence of academics and practitioners in user-centered design and usability
Our field faces threats to its legitimacy that we will have trouble dealing with if we continue to allow a split between academia and practice. Many academics face obstacles in the way of more "relevant" research that would be more meaningful to practitioners, and practitioners tend to see academic research as not relevant to them in reinforcing their professional identity, skills, and legitimacy as the organizational experts in user research. Meanwhile, many practitioners feel they are threatened by a perceived commoditization and co-opting of user-centered design (UCD) and user experience (UX) work. These two trends or tendencies are rarely mentioned together. How they are related, and how we address these issues will have a significant bearing on whether our field will continue to advance or whether it will wither.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信