平等的

R. Graycar, J. Morgan
{"title":"平等的","authors":"R. Graycar, J. Morgan","doi":"10.22459/sdut.09.2010.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines a proposal to recast Australia’s federal discrimination laws by doing away with the current fragmented approach by which there are separate legislative regimes responding to sex, race, age and disability discrimination and instead replace them with a combined “Equality Act�?. It considers whether the proposal might enhance women’s equality in Australia and whether it might more effectively respond to the fact that women have a multiplicity of intersecting identities – ie, they have a race, a sexuality, differing physical abilities etc – in different times and in different contexts. It also examines whether such an approach might effectively transcend the complaints-based focus of traditional discrimination laws. Finally, the chapter considers the processes and the fora within which these issues have been debated.","PeriodicalId":358833,"journal":{"name":"University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equality Unmodified\",\"authors\":\"R. Graycar, J. Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/sdut.09.2010.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines a proposal to recast Australia’s federal discrimination laws by doing away with the current fragmented approach by which there are separate legislative regimes responding to sex, race, age and disability discrimination and instead replace them with a combined “Equality Act�?. It considers whether the proposal might enhance women’s equality in Australia and whether it might more effectively respond to the fact that women have a multiplicity of intersecting identities – ie, they have a race, a sexuality, differing physical abilities etc – in different times and in different contexts. It also examines whether such an approach might effectively transcend the complaints-based focus of traditional discrimination laws. Finally, the chapter considers the processes and the fora within which these issues have been debated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/sdut.09.2010.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/sdut.09.2010.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本章探讨了一项提案,该提案旨在通过废除目前的支离破碎的方法来重塑澳大利亚的联邦歧视法,通过这种方法,有单独的立法制度来应对性别,种族,年龄和残疾歧视,取而代之的是一个综合的“平等法”。委员会考虑该提案是否能促进澳大利亚妇女的平等,是否能更有效地回应妇女在不同时代和不同背景下具有多重交叉身份的事实——即她们有种族、性取向、不同的身体能力等。它还审查了这种方法是否可以有效地超越传统反歧视法以投诉为基础的重点。最后,本章考虑了辩论这些问题的过程和论坛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equality Unmodified
This chapter examines a proposal to recast Australia’s federal discrimination laws by doing away with the current fragmented approach by which there are separate legislative regimes responding to sex, race, age and disability discrimination and instead replace them with a combined “Equality Act�?. It considers whether the proposal might enhance women’s equality in Australia and whether it might more effectively respond to the fact that women have a multiplicity of intersecting identities – ie, they have a race, a sexuality, differing physical abilities etc – in different times and in different contexts. It also examines whether such an approach might effectively transcend the complaints-based focus of traditional discrimination laws. Finally, the chapter considers the processes and the fora within which these issues have been debated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信