建筑规范

R. Theckethil
{"title":"建筑规范","authors":"R. Theckethil","doi":"10.1300/J460v01n04_09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Disaster management policies, often technocratic in scope and imagination, are characterized by a strong emphasis on physical vulnerability reduction through the adoption of stronger building codes, development regulations and land use planning methods like zoning and subdivision regulations. However, effectiveness of such measures in reducing disaster vulnerability depends on both the enforcement mechanism and the social, economic, political and cultural contexts within which such measures are operationalized. Through a detailed analysis of one such regulatory measure, building codes, this paper suggests that despite the criticisms of increased costs, prescriptive nature, non-participatory code-making process and other administrative hurdles associated with building codes, they could be modified to address such issues in innovative ways. This requires further exploration of performance-based building codes, institutional framework to ensure democratic and participatory code-making process and above all conscious efforts at the policy level to bridge the gap between technical expertise and experiential knowledge in order to enhance the role of building codes in reducing the vulnerability of urban areas.","PeriodicalId":345897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Security Education","volume":"65 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Codes\",\"authors\":\"R. Theckethil\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J460v01n04_09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Disaster management policies, often technocratic in scope and imagination, are characterized by a strong emphasis on physical vulnerability reduction through the adoption of stronger building codes, development regulations and land use planning methods like zoning and subdivision regulations. However, effectiveness of such measures in reducing disaster vulnerability depends on both the enforcement mechanism and the social, economic, political and cultural contexts within which such measures are operationalized. Through a detailed analysis of one such regulatory measure, building codes, this paper suggests that despite the criticisms of increased costs, prescriptive nature, non-participatory code-making process and other administrative hurdles associated with building codes, they could be modified to address such issues in innovative ways. This requires further exploration of performance-based building codes, institutional framework to ensure democratic and participatory code-making process and above all conscious efforts at the policy level to bridge the gap between technical expertise and experiential knowledge in order to enhance the role of building codes in reducing the vulnerability of urban areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Security Education\",\"volume\":\"65 12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Security Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J460v01n04_09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Security Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J460v01n04_09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

灾害管理政策通常在范围和想象力上都是技术官僚主义的,其特点是通过采用更严格的建筑规范、开发法规和土地使用规划方法(如分区和细分法规)来强调减少物理脆弱性。然而,这些措施在减少灾害脆弱性方面的效力取决于执行机制和实施这些措施的社会、经济、政治和文化背景。通过对建筑规范这一监管措施的详细分析,本文提出,尽管存在成本增加、规范性、非参与性规范制定过程和其他与建筑规范相关的行政障碍等批评,但可以对其进行修改,以创新的方式解决这些问题。这就需要进一步探索以业绩为基础的建筑法规,体制框架,以确保民主和参与性的法规制定过程,最重要的是在政策一级有意识地努力弥合技术专门知识和经验知识之间的差距,以便加强建筑法规在减少城市地区脆弱性方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building Codes
Abstract Disaster management policies, often technocratic in scope and imagination, are characterized by a strong emphasis on physical vulnerability reduction through the adoption of stronger building codes, development regulations and land use planning methods like zoning and subdivision regulations. However, effectiveness of such measures in reducing disaster vulnerability depends on both the enforcement mechanism and the social, economic, political and cultural contexts within which such measures are operationalized. Through a detailed analysis of one such regulatory measure, building codes, this paper suggests that despite the criticisms of increased costs, prescriptive nature, non-participatory code-making process and other administrative hurdles associated with building codes, they could be modified to address such issues in innovative ways. This requires further exploration of performance-based building codes, institutional framework to ensure democratic and participatory code-making process and above all conscious efforts at the policy level to bridge the gap between technical expertise and experiential knowledge in order to enhance the role of building codes in reducing the vulnerability of urban areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信