Jolita Gečienė, Vida Gudžinskienė
{"title":"Socialinės globos įstaigų, dirbančių su senyvo amžiaus asmenimis, teikiamų paslaugų kokybės vertinimas","authors":"Jolita Gečienė, Vida Gudžinskienė","doi":"10.15823/su.2018.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After having analyzed the quality assessment models, it has become clear that EQUASS quality system in the EU countries is recognized as the most suitable one in the social sector. In order to collect empirical data, in 2017 quantitative study was carried out. The method of the research was a questionnaire survey. The quality of social services is assessed and the questionnaire is based on the EQUASS methodology. This methodology reveals the strengths and weaknesses of services. EQUASS system and the questionnaire prepared includes 10 quality principles: 1. Leadership; 2. Personnel; 3. Rights; 4. Ethics; 5. Partnership; 6. Participation; 7. Personal orientation; 8. Complexity; 9. Performance orientation; 10. Continuous improvement. All the principles enlisted are based on the European Quality Assurance System in Social Services. Research subjects – employees of social welfare institutions providing long-term/ short-term social care services for the elderly in Lithuania according to the list of occupations of employees in the field of social services (2014). The research involved 105 heads of institutions, 122 social workers, 36 employment specialists and 78 social work assistants working in social care institutions providing services for the elderly people. The SPSS data processing program is used to analyze the research data. The results of the research showed that according to the subjective assessment of the research participants, in general the overall level of service quality in social care institutions working with elderly people is quite high. The quality of social care home care services is mostly related to orientation to person, leadership, rights and ethics, and, to a lesser extent, to complexity, personnel, performance orientation, continuous improvement and participation, and the least to the partnership. Care homes employees of different positions similarly evaluate the overall quality, the response rates vary slightly. The vast majority of respondents indicate that social services provided in their care institutions are sufficient. A majority of respondents evaluate the general and special services very well and well. The analysis of the results of the research revealed that according the vast majority (85.6%) of the research subjects, the quality of the social services provided by the institution can be improved; the heads of the institutions hold this opinion considerably more often than the employees of other posts.","PeriodicalId":303026,"journal":{"name":"Socialinis ugdymas","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialinis ugdymas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15823/su.2018.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过对质量评估模型的分析,可以清楚地看出,欧盟国家的EQUASS质量体系被认为是最适合社会部门的质量体系。为了收集实证数据,2017年进行了定量研究。本研究的方法为问卷调查。对社会服务的质量进行了评估,调查问卷是根据EQUASS方法编制的。这种方法揭示了服务的优点和缺点。EQUASS系统和问卷的编制包括10个质量原则:1。领导力;2. 人员;3.。权利;4. 道德规范;5. 伙伴关系;6. 参与;7. 个人取向;8. 复杂性;9. 性能取向;10. 持续改进。所有列出的原则都是基于欧洲社会服务质量保证体系。研究对象-根据立陶宛社会服务领域雇员职业清单,为老年人提供长期/短期社会护理服务的社会福利机构雇员(2014年)。这项研究涉及105名机构负责人、122名社会工作者、36名就业专家和78名在社会护理机构为老年人提供服务的社会工作助理。使用SPSS数据处理程序对研究数据进行分析。研究结果表明,根据研究参与者的主观评价,总体而言,社会护理机构为老年人提供的服务质量总体水平较高。社会养老服务质量与个人取向、领导取向、权利取向和道德取向的关系最大,与复杂性、人员取向、绩效取向、持续改进和参与的关系次之,与伙伴关系的关系最小。不同岗位的护理院员工对整体质量的评价相似,答复率略有差异。绝大多数答复者表示,其照料机构提供的社会服务是充分的。大多数答复者对一般和特别服务的评价非常好。对研究结果的分析显示,绝大多数(85.6%)的研究对象认为机构提供的社会服务质量可以得到改善;机构负责人比其他职位的雇员更常持有这种观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socialinės globos įstaigų, dirbančių su senyvo amžiaus asmenimis, teikiamų paslaugų kokybės vertinimas
After having analyzed the quality assessment models, it has become clear that EQUASS quality system in the EU countries is recognized as the most suitable one in the social sector. In order to collect empirical data, in 2017 quantitative study was carried out. The method of the research was a questionnaire survey. The quality of social services is assessed and the questionnaire is based on the EQUASS methodology. This methodology reveals the strengths and weaknesses of services. EQUASS system and the questionnaire prepared includes 10 quality principles: 1. Leadership; 2. Personnel; 3. Rights; 4. Ethics; 5. Partnership; 6. Participation; 7. Personal orientation; 8. Complexity; 9. Performance orientation; 10. Continuous improvement. All the principles enlisted are based on the European Quality Assurance System in Social Services. Research subjects – employees of social welfare institutions providing long-term/ short-term social care services for the elderly in Lithuania according to the list of occupations of employees in the field of social services (2014). The research involved 105 heads of institutions, 122 social workers, 36 employment specialists and 78 social work assistants working in social care institutions providing services for the elderly people. The SPSS data processing program is used to analyze the research data. The results of the research showed that according to the subjective assessment of the research participants, in general the overall level of service quality in social care institutions working with elderly people is quite high. The quality of social care home care services is mostly related to orientation to person, leadership, rights and ethics, and, to a lesser extent, to complexity, personnel, performance orientation, continuous improvement and participation, and the least to the partnership. Care homes employees of different positions similarly evaluate the overall quality, the response rates vary slightly. The vast majority of respondents indicate that social services provided in their care institutions are sufficient. A majority of respondents evaluate the general and special services very well and well. The analysis of the results of the research revealed that according the vast majority (85.6%) of the research subjects, the quality of the social services provided by the institution can be improved; the heads of the institutions hold this opinion considerably more often than the employees of other posts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信