{"title":"[对悬臂桥的重新审视-一项截面研究]。","authors":"E Paulisch, M Hartmann, C Thierfelder, K P Lange","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present study reexaminations of 28 cantilever bridges and 26 conventional bridges were carried out. The aim was to evaluate the periodontal conditions and to give recommendations for use. Parameters were PI, GI, tooth mobility, pocket depth, gingival recession and BOP. Deducing from the results, which were statistical analysed, we recommend the cantilever bridges by right using. Special attention should be directed to antagonistical dentition.</p>","PeriodicalId":77521,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)","volume":"41 12","pages":"475-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reexamination of cantilever bridges-a cross-section study].\",\"authors\":\"E Paulisch, M Hartmann, C Thierfelder, K P Lange\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the present study reexaminations of 28 cantilever bridges and 26 conventional bridges were carried out. The aim was to evaluate the periodontal conditions and to give recommendations for use. Parameters were PI, GI, tooth mobility, pocket depth, gingival recession and BOP. Deducing from the results, which were statistical analysed, we recommend the cantilever bridges by right using. Special attention should be directed to antagonistical dentition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)\",\"volume\":\"41 12\",\"pages\":\"475-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Reexamination of cantilever bridges-a cross-section study].
In the present study reexaminations of 28 cantilever bridges and 26 conventional bridges were carried out. The aim was to evaluate the periodontal conditions and to give recommendations for use. Parameters were PI, GI, tooth mobility, pocket depth, gingival recession and BOP. Deducing from the results, which were statistical analysed, we recommend the cantilever bridges by right using. Special attention should be directed to antagonistical dentition.