工会与不平等报酬:“家庭工资”的确立

Lilach Lurie
{"title":"工会与不平等报酬:“家庭工资”的确立","authors":"Lilach Lurie","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2661484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Israeli Male and Female Workers Equal Pay Law of 1996 declares that men and women are entitled to equal pay for the same work. Nevertheless, most sectoral collective agreements in Israel afford only men with the right to a \"family supplement\". The current article seeks to understand the historical and sociological origins of \"family supplement\" arrangements through both historical archival research and comparative research. The research shows that Histadrut established the family supplement as part of its efforts to establish an egalitarian and just society in the first half of the twentieth century. Nonetheless, through the national struggle towards an egalitarian state (and a family supplement), the interests of women as a group were neglected. While family supplement arrangements could have been justified in the first half of the twentieth century, they certainly cannot be justified in the twenty-first century.","PeriodicalId":373008,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unions and unequal pay: The establishment of the “family wage”\",\"authors\":\"Lilach Lurie\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2661484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Israeli Male and Female Workers Equal Pay Law of 1996 declares that men and women are entitled to equal pay for the same work. Nevertheless, most sectoral collective agreements in Israel afford only men with the right to a \\\"family supplement\\\". The current article seeks to understand the historical and sociological origins of \\\"family supplement\\\" arrangements through both historical archival research and comparative research. The research shows that Histadrut established the family supplement as part of its efforts to establish an egalitarian and just society in the first half of the twentieth century. Nonetheless, through the national struggle towards an egalitarian state (and a family supplement), the interests of women as a group were neglected. While family supplement arrangements could have been justified in the first half of the twentieth century, they certainly cannot be justified in the twenty-first century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2661484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2661484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1996年《以色列男女工人同工同酬法》宣布,男女有权获得同工同酬。然而,以色列大多数部门集体协议只给予男子获得“家庭补助”的权利。本文试图通过历史档案研究和比较研究来了解“家庭补充”安排的历史和社会学根源。研究表明,在20世纪上半叶,作为建立平等和公正社会的努力的一部分,Histadrut建立了家庭补充。尽管如此,在向平等主义国家(和家庭补充)的国家斗争中,妇女作为一个群体的利益被忽视了。虽然家庭补助安排在20世纪上半叶可能是合理的,但在21世纪肯定是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unions and unequal pay: The establishment of the “family wage”
The Israeli Male and Female Workers Equal Pay Law of 1996 declares that men and women are entitled to equal pay for the same work. Nevertheless, most sectoral collective agreements in Israel afford only men with the right to a "family supplement". The current article seeks to understand the historical and sociological origins of "family supplement" arrangements through both historical archival research and comparative research. The research shows that Histadrut established the family supplement as part of its efforts to establish an egalitarian and just society in the first half of the twentieth century. Nonetheless, through the national struggle towards an egalitarian state (and a family supplement), the interests of women as a group were neglected. While family supplement arrangements could have been justified in the first half of the twentieth century, they certainly cannot be justified in the twenty-first century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信