视点对应规范的格式良好的规则

J. Romero, Antonio Vallecillo
{"title":"视点对应规范的格式良好的规则","authors":"J. Romero, Antonio Vallecillo","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2008.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service Enterprise Architecture (SEA) is nowadays gaining a wider audience in companies using large-scale IT systems. It combines service orientation and viewpoint modeling. Hence, service orientation is attractive due to its ability to virtualize component architecture and to enable easier composition and contractualization. However, services may be defined at multiple levels (business, application, technology) and viewpoint modeling permits to adopt a systematic approach. This paper compares several frameworks (Zachman, RM-ODP) and methodologies (TOGAF/ADM, Praxeme, ThinkService). A special focus is made on their ability to handle viewpoint correspondences and evolution management.","PeriodicalId":205960,"journal":{"name":"2008 12th Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Well-formed Rules for Viewpoint Correspondences Specification\",\"authors\":\"J. Romero, Antonio Vallecillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOCW.2008.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Service Enterprise Architecture (SEA) is nowadays gaining a wider audience in companies using large-scale IT systems. It combines service orientation and viewpoint modeling. Hence, service orientation is attractive due to its ability to virtualize component architecture and to enable easier composition and contractualization. However, services may be defined at multiple levels (business, application, technology) and viewpoint modeling permits to adopt a systematic approach. This paper compares several frameworks (Zachman, RM-ODP) and methodologies (TOGAF/ADM, Praxeme, ThinkService). A special focus is made on their ability to handle viewpoint correspondences and evolution management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 12th Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 12th Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2008.63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 12th Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2008.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

如今,服务企业架构(SEA)在使用大规模IT系统的公司中获得了更广泛的受众。它结合了面向服务和视点建模。因此,面向服务很有吸引力,因为它能够虚拟化组件体系结构并支持更容易的组合和契约化。但是,可以在多个级别(业务、应用程序、技术)上定义服务,并且视点建模允许采用系统的方法。本文比较了几种框架(Zachman, RM-ODP)和方法(TOGAF/ADM, Praxeme, ThinkService)。特别关注的是它们处理视点通信和进化管理的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Well-formed Rules for Viewpoint Correspondences Specification
Service Enterprise Architecture (SEA) is nowadays gaining a wider audience in companies using large-scale IT systems. It combines service orientation and viewpoint modeling. Hence, service orientation is attractive due to its ability to virtualize component architecture and to enable easier composition and contractualization. However, services may be defined at multiple levels (business, application, technology) and viewpoint modeling permits to adopt a systematic approach. This paper compares several frameworks (Zachman, RM-ODP) and methodologies (TOGAF/ADM, Praxeme, ThinkService). A special focus is made on their ability to handle viewpoint correspondences and evolution management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信