完善数据库权利促进数据经济发展

{"title":"完善数据库权利促进数据经济发展","authors":"","doi":"10.30582/kdps.2023.36.1.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to support the transition to a data economy where data functions as an important product and commodity, it is necessary to establish an institution to encourage producing and opening quality datasets. Database right under the Copyright Act and the prohibition of unauthorized use of other’s achievements and illegal use of data under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act serves as potential institution for protection of datasets. Each of these has its own strengths and weaknesses and can play a role, but the prospects of the database right stand out in particular. This is because it has excellent clarity and predictability, protects against infringement by non-competitors, and separates the domains of monopoly and sharing appropriately and clearly. However, database right is not without room for improvement. First, there are unstructured datasets without searchability among training data for AI, and it is necessary to remove the element of searchability from the concept of database in order to include them in the scope of protection. Second, in order to compensate for the uncertainty of protection requirements, it is necessary to introduce the provision for presuming the establishment of ‘substantial part’ of the database when structural information on the arrangement or composition of materials is included. Third, it is necessary to reexamine the boundary between monopoly and sharing. For example, if the database is the sole source for a certain data, it may be desirable to introduce a compulsory licensing regime according to the FRAND standard.","PeriodicalId":350441,"journal":{"name":"Korea Copyright Commission","volume":"2004 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Database Rights for the Development of Data Economy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.30582/kdps.2023.36.1.95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to support the transition to a data economy where data functions as an important product and commodity, it is necessary to establish an institution to encourage producing and opening quality datasets. Database right under the Copyright Act and the prohibition of unauthorized use of other’s achievements and illegal use of data under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act serves as potential institution for protection of datasets. Each of these has its own strengths and weaknesses and can play a role, but the prospects of the database right stand out in particular. This is because it has excellent clarity and predictability, protects against infringement by non-competitors, and separates the domains of monopoly and sharing appropriately and clearly. However, database right is not without room for improvement. First, there are unstructured datasets without searchability among training data for AI, and it is necessary to remove the element of searchability from the concept of database in order to include them in the scope of protection. Second, in order to compensate for the uncertainty of protection requirements, it is necessary to introduce the provision for presuming the establishment of ‘substantial part’ of the database when structural information on the arrangement or composition of materials is included. Third, it is necessary to reexamine the boundary between monopoly and sharing. For example, if the database is the sole source for a certain data, it may be desirable to introduce a compulsory licensing regime according to the FRAND standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korea Copyright Commission\",\"volume\":\"2004 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korea Copyright Commission\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30582/kdps.2023.36.1.95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Copyright Commission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30582/kdps.2023.36.1.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了支持向数据经济的过渡,数据作为一种重要的产品和商品,有必要建立一个机构来鼓励生产和开放高质量的数据集。《版权法》规定的数据库权和《反不正当竞争法》规定的禁止未经授权使用他人成果和非法使用数据是保护数据集的潜在制度。每一种都有自己的长处和短处,可以发挥作用,但数据库权的前景尤其突出。这是因为它具有出色的明确性和可预测性,防止非竞争对手的侵权,并适当而清晰地区分垄断和共享领域。但是,数据库权也不是没有改进的余地。首先,人工智能训练数据中存在不可搜索性的非结构化数据集,需要从数据库的概念中去除可搜索性的元素,将其纳入保护范围。其次,为了补偿保护要求的不确定性,有必要在包含材料排列或组成的结构信息时引入假定建立数据库“实质性部分”的规定。第三,有必要重新审视垄断与共享的界限。例如,如果数据库是某些数据的唯一来源,则可能需要根据FRAND标准引入强制许可制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improvement of Database Rights for the Development of Data Economy
In order to support the transition to a data economy where data functions as an important product and commodity, it is necessary to establish an institution to encourage producing and opening quality datasets. Database right under the Copyright Act and the prohibition of unauthorized use of other’s achievements and illegal use of data under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act serves as potential institution for protection of datasets. Each of these has its own strengths and weaknesses and can play a role, but the prospects of the database right stand out in particular. This is because it has excellent clarity and predictability, protects against infringement by non-competitors, and separates the domains of monopoly and sharing appropriately and clearly. However, database right is not without room for improvement. First, there are unstructured datasets without searchability among training data for AI, and it is necessary to remove the element of searchability from the concept of database in order to include them in the scope of protection. Second, in order to compensate for the uncertainty of protection requirements, it is necessary to introduce the provision for presuming the establishment of ‘substantial part’ of the database when structural information on the arrangement or composition of materials is included. Third, it is necessary to reexamine the boundary between monopoly and sharing. For example, if the database is the sole source for a certain data, it may be desirable to introduce a compulsory licensing regime according to the FRAND standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信