手术后护理

Usman Latif, Tyler A. Concannon, Andrew G. C. Frazier
{"title":"手术后护理","authors":"Usman Latif, Tyler A. Concannon, Andrew G. C. Frazier","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197607947.003.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses postoperative recommendations, including ambulation, wound care, antibiotic guidelines, and follow-up interval, for patients who have undergone open surgical SIJ fusion versus minimally invasive (MIS) SIJ fusion. Postoperative care varies widely based on the surgical approach. In particular, patients undergoing MIS are less likely to be admitted, ambulate sooner, have a shorter period of less stringent restrictions, and have faster wound healing with fewer complications. These benefits are due to a variety of factors including shorter incision length, less tissue disruption, decreased operating time, and less blood loss. This benefit is most pronounced with approaches that do not involve the use of hardware. Patients undergoing open surgery typically progress through a 4- to 5-month phased plan of progressive physical therapy. In contrast, patients undergoing MIS, particularly percutaneous SIJ fusion with bone allograft, are able to ambulate immediately and have a short period of mild restrictions followed by return to normal activity. The advent of new surgical techniques and less invasive solutions for SIJ fusion is leading the way to an easier postoperative recovery period for patients.","PeriodicalId":131285,"journal":{"name":"Sacroiliac Joint Pain","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative care\",\"authors\":\"Usman Latif, Tyler A. Concannon, Andrew G. C. Frazier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780197607947.003.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter discusses postoperative recommendations, including ambulation, wound care, antibiotic guidelines, and follow-up interval, for patients who have undergone open surgical SIJ fusion versus minimally invasive (MIS) SIJ fusion. Postoperative care varies widely based on the surgical approach. In particular, patients undergoing MIS are less likely to be admitted, ambulate sooner, have a shorter period of less stringent restrictions, and have faster wound healing with fewer complications. These benefits are due to a variety of factors including shorter incision length, less tissue disruption, decreased operating time, and less blood loss. This benefit is most pronounced with approaches that do not involve the use of hardware. Patients undergoing open surgery typically progress through a 4- to 5-month phased plan of progressive physical therapy. In contrast, patients undergoing MIS, particularly percutaneous SIJ fusion with bone allograft, are able to ambulate immediately and have a short period of mild restrictions followed by return to normal activity. The advent of new surgical techniques and less invasive solutions for SIJ fusion is leading the way to an easier postoperative recovery period for patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sacroiliac Joint Pain\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sacroiliac Joint Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197607947.003.0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sacroiliac Joint Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197607947.003.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章讨论了开放性SIJ融合与微创SIJ融合患者的术后建议,包括下床、伤口护理、抗生素指南和随访间隔。术后护理因手术方式不同而有很大差异。特别是,接受MIS的患者入院的可能性更小,行走更快,限制时间更短,伤口愈合更快,并发症更少。这些好处是由于各种因素,包括更短的切口长度,更少的组织破坏,减少手术时间,更少的失血。这种好处在不涉及使用硬件的方法中最为明显。接受开放手术的患者通常要经过4到5个月的渐进物理治疗计划。相比之下,接受MIS的患者,特别是经皮SIJ融合异体骨移植物的患者,能够立即行走,并有短时间的轻度限制,随后恢复正常活动。新的手术技术和微创SIJ融合解决方案的出现,为患者带来了更容易的术后恢复期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative care
This chapter discusses postoperative recommendations, including ambulation, wound care, antibiotic guidelines, and follow-up interval, for patients who have undergone open surgical SIJ fusion versus minimally invasive (MIS) SIJ fusion. Postoperative care varies widely based on the surgical approach. In particular, patients undergoing MIS are less likely to be admitted, ambulate sooner, have a shorter period of less stringent restrictions, and have faster wound healing with fewer complications. These benefits are due to a variety of factors including shorter incision length, less tissue disruption, decreased operating time, and less blood loss. This benefit is most pronounced with approaches that do not involve the use of hardware. Patients undergoing open surgery typically progress through a 4- to 5-month phased plan of progressive physical therapy. In contrast, patients undergoing MIS, particularly percutaneous SIJ fusion with bone allograft, are able to ambulate immediately and have a short period of mild restrictions followed by return to normal activity. The advent of new surgical techniques and less invasive solutions for SIJ fusion is leading the way to an easier postoperative recovery period for patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信