Cynthia C. S. Liem, A. Rauber, T. Lidy, Richard Lewis, C. Raphael, J. Reiss, T. Crawford, A. Hanjalic
{"title":"音乐信息技术和专业利益相关者听众:注意采纳差距","authors":"Cynthia C. S. Liem, A. Rauber, T. Lidy, Richard Lewis, C. Raphael, J. Reiss, T. Crawford, A. Hanjalic","doi":"10.4230/DFU.Vol3.11041.227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The academic discipline focusing on the processing and organization of digital music information, commonly known as Music Information Retrieval (MIR), has multidisciplinary roots and interests. Thus, MIR technologies have the potential to have impact across disciplinary boundaries and to enhance the handling of music information in many different user communities. However, in practice, many MIR research agenda items appear to have a hard time leaving the lab in order to be widely adopted by their intended audiences. On one hand, this is because the MIR field still is relatively young, and technologies therefore need to mature. On the other hand, there may be deeper, more fundamental challenges with regard to the user audience. In this contribution, we discuss MIR technology adoption issues that were experienced with professional music stakeholders in audio mixing, performance, musicology and sales industry. Many of these stakeholders have mindsets and priorities that differ considerably from those of most MIR academics, influencing their reception of new MIR technology. We mention the major observed differences and their backgrounds, and argue that these are essential to be taken into account to allow for truly successful cross-disciplinary collaboration and technology adoption in MIR.","PeriodicalId":400865,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Music Processing","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Music Information Technology and Professional Stakeholder Audiences: Mind the Adoption Gap\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia C. S. Liem, A. Rauber, T. Lidy, Richard Lewis, C. Raphael, J. Reiss, T. Crawford, A. Hanjalic\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/DFU.Vol3.11041.227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The academic discipline focusing on the processing and organization of digital music information, commonly known as Music Information Retrieval (MIR), has multidisciplinary roots and interests. Thus, MIR technologies have the potential to have impact across disciplinary boundaries and to enhance the handling of music information in many different user communities. However, in practice, many MIR research agenda items appear to have a hard time leaving the lab in order to be widely adopted by their intended audiences. On one hand, this is because the MIR field still is relatively young, and technologies therefore need to mature. On the other hand, there may be deeper, more fundamental challenges with regard to the user audience. In this contribution, we discuss MIR technology adoption issues that were experienced with professional music stakeholders in audio mixing, performance, musicology and sales industry. Many of these stakeholders have mindsets and priorities that differ considerably from those of most MIR academics, influencing their reception of new MIR technology. We mention the major observed differences and their backgrounds, and argue that these are essential to be taken into account to allow for truly successful cross-disciplinary collaboration and technology adoption in MIR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multimodal Music Processing\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multimodal Music Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/DFU.Vol3.11041.227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Music Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/DFU.Vol3.11041.227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
音乐信息检索(music information Retrieval, MIR)是一门关注数字音乐信息处理和组织的学科,具有多学科的根基和兴趣。因此,MIR技术有可能跨越学科界限产生影响,并在许多不同的用户群体中增强对音乐信息的处理。然而,在实践中,许多MIR研究议程项目似乎很难离开实验室,以便被其目标受众广泛采用。一方面,这是因为MIR领域仍然相对年轻,因此技术需要成熟。另一方面,在用户群体方面可能存在更深层次、更根本的挑战。在这篇文章中,我们讨论了在音频混音、表演、音乐学和销售行业的专业音乐利益相关者所经历的MIR技术采用问题。这些利益相关者中的许多人的心态和优先事项与大多数MIR学者有很大的不同,这影响了他们对新的MIR技术的接受。我们提到了观察到的主要差异及其背景,并认为这些是必须考虑到的,以便在MIR中实现真正成功的跨学科合作和技术采用。
Music Information Technology and Professional Stakeholder Audiences: Mind the Adoption Gap
The academic discipline focusing on the processing and organization of digital music information, commonly known as Music Information Retrieval (MIR), has multidisciplinary roots and interests. Thus, MIR technologies have the potential to have impact across disciplinary boundaries and to enhance the handling of music information in many different user communities. However, in practice, many MIR research agenda items appear to have a hard time leaving the lab in order to be widely adopted by their intended audiences. On one hand, this is because the MIR field still is relatively young, and technologies therefore need to mature. On the other hand, there may be deeper, more fundamental challenges with regard to the user audience. In this contribution, we discuss MIR technology adoption issues that were experienced with professional music stakeholders in audio mixing, performance, musicology and sales industry. Many of these stakeholders have mindsets and priorities that differ considerably from those of most MIR academics, influencing their reception of new MIR technology. We mention the major observed differences and their backgrounds, and argue that these are essential to be taken into account to allow for truly successful cross-disciplinary collaboration and technology adoption in MIR.