结核病筛查:医院工作人员目前的做法和态度

J.E. Clague, P. Fields, D.R. Graham, P.D.O. Davies
{"title":"结核病筛查:医院工作人员目前的做法和态度","authors":"J.E. Clague,&nbsp;P. Fields,&nbsp;D.R. Graham,&nbsp;P.D.O. Davies","doi":"10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To examine the current practices and attitudes of health workers to the prevention of tuberculosis in our 55-bed chest unit, we investigated the tuberculin reactor status, reviewed pre-employment screening and reviewed the action taken after contact with tuberculosis by staff members. We assessed all 61 staff members, including 44 nurses, 1 physiotherapist, 11 doctors and 5 domestic workers. <span><math><mtext>47</mtext><mtext>61</mtext></math></span> staff members had had BCG vaccination. Heaf testing revealed 3 Heaf-negative subjects and, of the remainder, 52 had grade 3 or stronger reactions. Only <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>11</mtext></math></span> doctors, <span><math><mtext>36</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>4</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had any pre-employment screening. No action was taken by any doctor after their last contact with tuberculosis, whereas <span><math><mtext>10</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had chest X-rays. This study shows the low importance with which the risk of tuberculosis is perceived, particularly by doctors and demonstrates the need for stricter supervision and improved quality of pre-employment screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23472,"journal":{"name":"Tubercle","volume":"72 4","pages":"Pages 265-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for tuberculosis: current practices and attitudes of hospital workers\",\"authors\":\"J.E. Clague,&nbsp;P. Fields,&nbsp;D.R. Graham,&nbsp;P.D.O. Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To examine the current practices and attitudes of health workers to the prevention of tuberculosis in our 55-bed chest unit, we investigated the tuberculin reactor status, reviewed pre-employment screening and reviewed the action taken after contact with tuberculosis by staff members. We assessed all 61 staff members, including 44 nurses, 1 physiotherapist, 11 doctors and 5 domestic workers. <span><math><mtext>47</mtext><mtext>61</mtext></math></span> staff members had had BCG vaccination. Heaf testing revealed 3 Heaf-negative subjects and, of the remainder, 52 had grade 3 or stronger reactions. Only <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>11</mtext></math></span> doctors, <span><math><mtext>36</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>4</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had any pre-employment screening. No action was taken by any doctor after their last contact with tuberculosis, whereas <span><math><mtext>10</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had chest X-rays. This study shows the low importance with which the risk of tuberculosis is perceived, particularly by doctors and demonstrates the need for stricter supervision and improved quality of pre-employment screening.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tubercle\",\"volume\":\"72 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 265-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tubercle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004138799190052T\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tubercle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004138799190052T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

为了检查目前卫生工作者对我们55张床位的胸科病房预防结核病的做法和态度,我们调查了结核菌素反应器状况,审查了就业前筛查,并审查了工作人员接触结核病后采取的行动。我们对61名工作人员进行了评估,包括44名护士、1名物理治疗师、11名医生和5名家庭佣工。4761名工作人员接种了卡介苗。热测试显示3名热阴性受试者,其余52人有3级或更强的反应。只有311名医生、3644名护士和45名家庭佣工接受过就业前筛查。在她们最后一次接触结核病后,没有任何医生采取任何行动,而有1044名护士和35名家庭佣工进行了胸部x光检查。这项研究表明,结核病风险的重要性很低,尤其是医生,并表明需要更严格的监督和提高就业前筛查的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening for tuberculosis: current practices and attitudes of hospital workers

To examine the current practices and attitudes of health workers to the prevention of tuberculosis in our 55-bed chest unit, we investigated the tuberculin reactor status, reviewed pre-employment screening and reviewed the action taken after contact with tuberculosis by staff members. We assessed all 61 staff members, including 44 nurses, 1 physiotherapist, 11 doctors and 5 domestic workers. 4761 staff members had had BCG vaccination. Heaf testing revealed 3 Heaf-negative subjects and, of the remainder, 52 had grade 3 or stronger reactions. Only 311 doctors, 3644 nurses and 45 domestic workers had had any pre-employment screening. No action was taken by any doctor after their last contact with tuberculosis, whereas 1044 nurses and 35 domestic workers had had chest X-rays. This study shows the low importance with which the risk of tuberculosis is perceived, particularly by doctors and demonstrates the need for stricter supervision and improved quality of pre-employment screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信