全渠道零售作为店内和家庭履行之间的平衡行为

E. Rabinovich, R. Sousa, Sungho Park, Sina Golara
{"title":"全渠道零售作为店内和家庭履行之间的平衡行为","authors":"E. Rabinovich, R. Sousa, Sungho Park, Sina Golara","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3113878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem Definition: Omnichannel retailers can fulfill online orders by allowing consumers to have their orders delivered from the retailers’ stores to the consumers’ homes (home fulfillment) or collect the orders at the stores (in-store fulfillment). Because the latter option does not involve costly last-mile deliveries to consumers’ homes, retailers have sought to make it more attractive by waiving the associated in-store fulfillment fees indiscriminately to consumers. We analyze the economic value of this strategy and compare it with that of a strategy we develop based on the use of targeted incentives to induce individual consumers to switch to in-store fulfillment after initially choosing home fulfillment for their orders. \nAcademic/Practical Relevance: We contribute an analysis of the economic value of price incentives involving home and in-store fulfillment options in omnichannel retailing. In so doing, we isolate determinants of consumer preferences between these options and show how retailers can use such preferences to develop pricing strategies to improve the economic value of their fulfillment services. \nMethodology: We use field data to evaluate the pricing strategies based on econometric models as well as machine-learning and routing algorithms. \nResults: While the removal of in-store fulfillment fees increases revenues from additional demand, these gains are much lower than the losses caused by (1) the revenue lost from the fees no longer collected and (2) the additional operating costs at the stores necessary to fulfill a higher volume of orders. Conversely, the costs from using targeted incentives are lower (almost 3 times) than the savings in last-mile delivery costs. \nManagerial Implications: To promote in-store fulfillment as an alternative to home fulfillment, retailers must go beyond incentive strategies that reward consumers indiscriminately, regardless of the value they attach to these fulfillment services. We show how retailers can develop dynamic pricing solutions to generate value in these services.","PeriodicalId":370988,"journal":{"name":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omnichannel Retailing as a Balancing Act between In-Store and Home Fulfillment\",\"authors\":\"E. Rabinovich, R. Sousa, Sungho Park, Sina Golara\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3113878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem Definition: Omnichannel retailers can fulfill online orders by allowing consumers to have their orders delivered from the retailers’ stores to the consumers’ homes (home fulfillment) or collect the orders at the stores (in-store fulfillment). Because the latter option does not involve costly last-mile deliveries to consumers’ homes, retailers have sought to make it more attractive by waiving the associated in-store fulfillment fees indiscriminately to consumers. We analyze the economic value of this strategy and compare it with that of a strategy we develop based on the use of targeted incentives to induce individual consumers to switch to in-store fulfillment after initially choosing home fulfillment for their orders. \\nAcademic/Practical Relevance: We contribute an analysis of the economic value of price incentives involving home and in-store fulfillment options in omnichannel retailing. In so doing, we isolate determinants of consumer preferences between these options and show how retailers can use such preferences to develop pricing strategies to improve the economic value of their fulfillment services. \\nMethodology: We use field data to evaluate the pricing strategies based on econometric models as well as machine-learning and routing algorithms. \\nResults: While the removal of in-store fulfillment fees increases revenues from additional demand, these gains are much lower than the losses caused by (1) the revenue lost from the fees no longer collected and (2) the additional operating costs at the stores necessary to fulfill a higher volume of orders. Conversely, the costs from using targeted incentives are lower (almost 3 times) than the savings in last-mile delivery costs. \\nManagerial Implications: To promote in-store fulfillment as an alternative to home fulfillment, retailers must go beyond incentive strategies that reward consumers indiscriminately, regardless of the value they attach to these fulfillment services. We show how retailers can develop dynamic pricing solutions to generate value in these services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3113878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3113878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

问题定义:全渠道零售商可以通过允许消费者将他们的订单从零售商的商店送到消费者的家中(家庭配送)或在商店收集订单(店内配送)来完成在线订单。由于后一种选择不涉及到昂贵的最后一英里送货上门,零售商试图通过不加区别地向消费者免除相关的店内配送费用,使其更具吸引力。我们分析了这种策略的经济价值,并将其与我们开发的一种策略进行了比较,这种策略是基于使用有针对性的激励措施来诱导个人消费者在最初选择家庭履行订单后转向店内履行。学术/实践相关性:我们对全渠道零售中涉及家庭和店内履行选项的价格激励的经济价值进行了分析。在这样做的过程中,我们在这些选择之间分离出消费者偏好的决定因素,并展示了零售商如何利用这些偏好来制定定价策略,以提高其履行服务的经济价值。方法:我们使用现场数据来评估基于计量经济模型以及机器学习和路由算法的定价策略。结果:虽然取消店内履约费增加了额外需求带来的收入,但这些收益远低于以下因素造成的损失:(1)不再收取费用带来的收入损失;(2)履行更多订单所需的门店额外运营成本。相反,使用有针对性的激励措施所节省的成本(几乎是最后一英里配送成本的三分之一)更低。管理启示:为了促进店内履行作为家庭履行的替代方案,零售商必须超越不分青红皂白地奖励消费者的激励策略,而不管他们对这些履行服务的价值。我们展示了零售商如何开发动态定价解决方案,从而在这些服务中创造价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Omnichannel Retailing as a Balancing Act between In-Store and Home Fulfillment
Problem Definition: Omnichannel retailers can fulfill online orders by allowing consumers to have their orders delivered from the retailers’ stores to the consumers’ homes (home fulfillment) or collect the orders at the stores (in-store fulfillment). Because the latter option does not involve costly last-mile deliveries to consumers’ homes, retailers have sought to make it more attractive by waiving the associated in-store fulfillment fees indiscriminately to consumers. We analyze the economic value of this strategy and compare it with that of a strategy we develop based on the use of targeted incentives to induce individual consumers to switch to in-store fulfillment after initially choosing home fulfillment for their orders. Academic/Practical Relevance: We contribute an analysis of the economic value of price incentives involving home and in-store fulfillment options in omnichannel retailing. In so doing, we isolate determinants of consumer preferences between these options and show how retailers can use such preferences to develop pricing strategies to improve the economic value of their fulfillment services. Methodology: We use field data to evaluate the pricing strategies based on econometric models as well as machine-learning and routing algorithms. Results: While the removal of in-store fulfillment fees increases revenues from additional demand, these gains are much lower than the losses caused by (1) the revenue lost from the fees no longer collected and (2) the additional operating costs at the stores necessary to fulfill a higher volume of orders. Conversely, the costs from using targeted incentives are lower (almost 3 times) than the savings in last-mile delivery costs. Managerial Implications: To promote in-store fulfillment as an alternative to home fulfillment, retailers must go beyond incentive strategies that reward consumers indiscriminately, regardless of the value they attach to these fulfillment services. We show how retailers can develop dynamic pricing solutions to generate value in these services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信