X医院Sesarea塞西西欧手术病人的抗生物测定和Ceftriaxone的经济评估

Echa Aisyah, Mardiati Nadjib
{"title":"X医院Sesarea塞西西欧手术病人的抗生物测定和Ceftriaxone的经济评估","authors":"Echa Aisyah, Mardiati Nadjib","doi":"10.7454/EKI.V3I2.3160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstrakPemberian antibiotik profilaksis pada operasi seksio sesarea sangat dianjurkan. Menurut pedoman umum penggunaan antibiotik obat dipilih atas dasar keamanan dan efektivitas biaya. Evaluasi ekonomi parsial berupa analisis biaya dan luaran ini menggunakan metode alongside observational study, data dikumpulkan selama bulan April–Mei 2017 secara prospektif mencakup 60 pasien dengan operasi seksio sesarea yang mendapatkan antibiotik profilaksis, membandingkan efektivitas biaya antara Cefotaxime dan Ceftriaxone. Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan karakteristik pada 60 pasien tersebut. Analisis menggunakan perspektif rumah sakit, dilaksanakan di rumah sakit milik Pemerintah di Jawa Barat. Hasil Systematic Review menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan efikasi pada penggunaan kedua obat tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini menkonfirmasi bahwa tidak ada perbedaan outcome klinis (berupa infeksi luka operasi) antara pasien yang mendapatkan antibiotik profilaksis Ceftriaxone dengan antibiotik Cefotaxime. Komponen biaya terbesar adalah biaya operasional (84,79%), diikuti biaya alokasi dari unit penunjang (13,68%), biaya investasi (1,2%) dan biaya pemeliharaan (0,32%). Analisis biaya satuan memberikan hasil biaya inkremental sebesar Rp. 342.535 pada satu episode rawat inap. Rumah sakit memiliki potensi untuk menghemat sebesar Rp. 317.529.945 setahun dengan memilih antibiotik profilaksis Cefotaxime pada pasien operasi seksio sesarea. AbstractA prophylactic antibiotic for patients with cesarean section surgery is highly recommended in the clinical guideline. The use of antibiotics is selected by using criteria safety and cost-effectiveness. This partial economic evaluation in the form of cost and outcome analysis was using alongside observational study method, prospective data were collected from April to May 2017 covering 60 patients with cesarean section surgery who received prophylaxis antibiotics, comparing cost-effectiveness between Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone. The statistical test showed that there were no differences of characteristics in the 60 patients. The analysis based on the hospital perspective carried out in a public hospital in West Java. The Systematic Review showed that there was no difference in the efficacy of the drugs. This study confirmed that there was no difference in clinical outcome on surgical wound infections either in the patient who received Ceftriaxone prophylaxis or Cefotaxime. The greatest component of the cost was the operational cost (84.79%), followed by indirect cost (13.68%), investment cost (1.2%), and maintenance cost (0.32%). The analysis suggested the incremental cost was IDR342,535 in one episode of treatment. The hospital would save the cost of IDR317,529,945 a year by choosing Cefotaxime prophylactic antibiotics for patients with cesarean section surgery.","PeriodicalId":427313,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ekonomi Kesehatan Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluasi Ekonomi Penggunaan Antibiotika Profilaksis Cefotaxime dan Ceftriaxone pada Pasien Operasi Seksio Sesarea di Rumah Sakit X\",\"authors\":\"Echa Aisyah, Mardiati Nadjib\",\"doi\":\"10.7454/EKI.V3I2.3160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstrakPemberian antibiotik profilaksis pada operasi seksio sesarea sangat dianjurkan. Menurut pedoman umum penggunaan antibiotik obat dipilih atas dasar keamanan dan efektivitas biaya. Evaluasi ekonomi parsial berupa analisis biaya dan luaran ini menggunakan metode alongside observational study, data dikumpulkan selama bulan April–Mei 2017 secara prospektif mencakup 60 pasien dengan operasi seksio sesarea yang mendapatkan antibiotik profilaksis, membandingkan efektivitas biaya antara Cefotaxime dan Ceftriaxone. Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan karakteristik pada 60 pasien tersebut. Analisis menggunakan perspektif rumah sakit, dilaksanakan di rumah sakit milik Pemerintah di Jawa Barat. Hasil Systematic Review menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan efikasi pada penggunaan kedua obat tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini menkonfirmasi bahwa tidak ada perbedaan outcome klinis (berupa infeksi luka operasi) antara pasien yang mendapatkan antibiotik profilaksis Ceftriaxone dengan antibiotik Cefotaxime. Komponen biaya terbesar adalah biaya operasional (84,79%), diikuti biaya alokasi dari unit penunjang (13,68%), biaya investasi (1,2%) dan biaya pemeliharaan (0,32%). Analisis biaya satuan memberikan hasil biaya inkremental sebesar Rp. 342.535 pada satu episode rawat inap. Rumah sakit memiliki potensi untuk menghemat sebesar Rp. 317.529.945 setahun dengan memilih antibiotik profilaksis Cefotaxime pada pasien operasi seksio sesarea. AbstractA prophylactic antibiotic for patients with cesarean section surgery is highly recommended in the clinical guideline. The use of antibiotics is selected by using criteria safety and cost-effectiveness. This partial economic evaluation in the form of cost and outcome analysis was using alongside observational study method, prospective data were collected from April to May 2017 covering 60 patients with cesarean section surgery who received prophylaxis antibiotics, comparing cost-effectiveness between Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone. The statistical test showed that there were no differences of characteristics in the 60 patients. The analysis based on the hospital perspective carried out in a public hospital in West Java. The Systematic Review showed that there was no difference in the efficacy of the drugs. This study confirmed that there was no difference in clinical outcome on surgical wound infections either in the patient who received Ceftriaxone prophylaxis or Cefotaxime. The greatest component of the cost was the operational cost (84.79%), followed by indirect cost (13.68%), investment cost (1.2%), and maintenance cost (0.32%). The analysis suggested the incremental cost was IDR342,535 in one episode of treatment. The hospital would save the cost of IDR317,529,945 a year by choosing Cefotaxime prophylactic antibiotics for patients with cesarean section surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ekonomi Kesehatan Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ekonomi Kesehatan Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7454/EKI.V3I2.3160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ekonomi Kesehatan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/EKI.V3I2.3160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建议在sesarea seseea手术中使用抗蛇酸抗生素。根据一般指导方针,在成本安全和有效性的基础上选择药物抗生素。今年4月至2017年5月,通过采用多边观察研究方法收集的数据,部分经济评估包括60名患者,他们接受了分析性抗生素的sesarea手术,比较了造影素和Ceftriaxone之间的成本效益。统计结果显示,这60名患者的特征没有差异。通过医院的视角进行分析,在西爪哇岛的一家政府医院进行。系统审查结果表明,这两种药物的使用没有明显的矛盾。这项研究证实,服用抗蛇毒杆菌素和造假剂抗生素的患者的临床结果(外科伤口感染)没有区别。成本的主要组成部分是经营成本(84.79%),其次是证券单位(13.68%)、投资成本(1.2%)和维修费(0.32%)的分配成本。单位成本分析在住院一集中给出了附加成本的结果。342535卢比。该医院有可能通过选择sesarea sesesio手术中的头孢杆菌抗生素来每年节省317529945卢比。剖宫产治疗抗生物活性药物在临床指南中被高度推荐。抗生素的使用是由惠特勒安全和成本效益选择的。这种用于成本和结果分析的部分经济评估采用了自2017年4月到5月收集的观察方法、数据探求,掩盖了自2011年4月以来收集到的60个病人,他们接受了抗生物前生的预防、利用Cefotaxime和Ceftriaxone之间具有成本效益的结果。统计测试表明,60个病人的性格没有什么不同。基于西爪哇一家公共医院的分析结果显示。系统审查表明,毒品的效力没有区别。这项研究证实,在手术结果中,无论是接受Ceftriaxone预防措施还是Cefotaxime的病人,都没有什么不同。投资成本(88.9%)、投资成本(1.2%)和维护成本(0.32%)所遵循的最重要的对应物。分析建议,增长的成本在一集治疗中占了342535分。医院将每年节省idr31752929945的费用,由Cefotaxime预防治疗,并进行cesarean手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluasi Ekonomi Penggunaan Antibiotika Profilaksis Cefotaxime dan Ceftriaxone pada Pasien Operasi Seksio Sesarea di Rumah Sakit X
AbstrakPemberian antibiotik profilaksis pada operasi seksio sesarea sangat dianjurkan. Menurut pedoman umum penggunaan antibiotik obat dipilih atas dasar keamanan dan efektivitas biaya. Evaluasi ekonomi parsial berupa analisis biaya dan luaran ini menggunakan metode alongside observational study, data dikumpulkan selama bulan April–Mei 2017 secara prospektif mencakup 60 pasien dengan operasi seksio sesarea yang mendapatkan antibiotik profilaksis, membandingkan efektivitas biaya antara Cefotaxime dan Ceftriaxone. Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan karakteristik pada 60 pasien tersebut. Analisis menggunakan perspektif rumah sakit, dilaksanakan di rumah sakit milik Pemerintah di Jawa Barat. Hasil Systematic Review menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan efikasi pada penggunaan kedua obat tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini menkonfirmasi bahwa tidak ada perbedaan outcome klinis (berupa infeksi luka operasi) antara pasien yang mendapatkan antibiotik profilaksis Ceftriaxone dengan antibiotik Cefotaxime. Komponen biaya terbesar adalah biaya operasional (84,79%), diikuti biaya alokasi dari unit penunjang (13,68%), biaya investasi (1,2%) dan biaya pemeliharaan (0,32%). Analisis biaya satuan memberikan hasil biaya inkremental sebesar Rp. 342.535 pada satu episode rawat inap. Rumah sakit memiliki potensi untuk menghemat sebesar Rp. 317.529.945 setahun dengan memilih antibiotik profilaksis Cefotaxime pada pasien operasi seksio sesarea. AbstractA prophylactic antibiotic for patients with cesarean section surgery is highly recommended in the clinical guideline. The use of antibiotics is selected by using criteria safety and cost-effectiveness. This partial economic evaluation in the form of cost and outcome analysis was using alongside observational study method, prospective data were collected from April to May 2017 covering 60 patients with cesarean section surgery who received prophylaxis antibiotics, comparing cost-effectiveness between Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone. The statistical test showed that there were no differences of characteristics in the 60 patients. The analysis based on the hospital perspective carried out in a public hospital in West Java. The Systematic Review showed that there was no difference in the efficacy of the drugs. This study confirmed that there was no difference in clinical outcome on surgical wound infections either in the patient who received Ceftriaxone prophylaxis or Cefotaxime. The greatest component of the cost was the operational cost (84.79%), followed by indirect cost (13.68%), investment cost (1.2%), and maintenance cost (0.32%). The analysis suggested the incremental cost was IDR342,535 in one episode of treatment. The hospital would save the cost of IDR317,529,945 a year by choosing Cefotaxime prophylactic antibiotics for patients with cesarean section surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信