使用薄覆盖物的河口湿地恢复:在乔治亚州不伦瑞克的试点应用

Shore & Beach Pub Date : 2021-11-05 DOI:10.34237/1008947
R. Mohan, Mark Reemts, P. Gupta, R. Galloway, Tim Johnson, R. Brown, Tim Donegan
{"title":"使用薄覆盖物的河口湿地恢复:在乔治亚州不伦瑞克的试点应用","authors":"R. Mohan, Mark Reemts, P. Gupta, R. Galloway, Tim Johnson, R. Brown, Tim Donegan","doi":"10.34237/1008947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the design concepts and basis for using a thin layer cover (TLC) of sand to restore historically impacted wetlands in Georgia’s Brunswick estuary. The project site is a mix of tidal creeks, marshes, brackish estuary, and an adjacent upland area that has been affected by historical industrial operations. A pilot project to test cover placement methodology and performance in advance of future full-scale TLC implementation was completed in 2018. It involved placing 6-9 inches of material in a 2/3-acre marsh area. Two material types — sand and higher organic content fines — were tested. The contractor, Sevenson Environmental Services, identified the appropriate equipment, means, and methods to hydraulically convey and place the TLC material within the pilot area in accordance with stated performance objectives. A mat-based access road was installed to enable equipment to move the pipeline and spray nozzle for fine placement control within the pilot marsh area. The thin cover placed in the field ranged from 6-12 inches thick (versus the design thickness of 6-9 inches) to meet the minimum required thickness and account for over placement. A 30- to 45-degree spray yielded the best distribution of materials for the equipment used. Placement of sandy material was faster and more uniform than fines due to the material’s enhanced settling characteristics and ease of distribution. A modified topsoil-fines mix with a baffle plate eventually permitted optimal placement of fines within the study area while maintaining the target organic content. Turbidity in the water discharged from the pilot area was minimized by environmental controls (e.g. perimeter hay bales) installed by the contractor. The mat-based access road initially experienced some settlement due to loading on the soft sediments and marsh root mat; the road required restoration following project completion. Physical and vegetative monitoring conducted in six-month increments over a two-year period indicated strong natural recolonization of vegetation and the re-establishment of benthic species including fiddler crab. This paper presents lessons learned, design implications, and best management practices for future thin cover placement projects in estuarine settings.","PeriodicalId":153020,"journal":{"name":"Shore & Beach","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restoration of estuarine wetlands using thin cover placement: A pilot application in Brunswick, Georgia\",\"authors\":\"R. Mohan, Mark Reemts, P. Gupta, R. Galloway, Tim Johnson, R. Brown, Tim Donegan\",\"doi\":\"10.34237/1008947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the design concepts and basis for using a thin layer cover (TLC) of sand to restore historically impacted wetlands in Georgia’s Brunswick estuary. The project site is a mix of tidal creeks, marshes, brackish estuary, and an adjacent upland area that has been affected by historical industrial operations. A pilot project to test cover placement methodology and performance in advance of future full-scale TLC implementation was completed in 2018. It involved placing 6-9 inches of material in a 2/3-acre marsh area. Two material types — sand and higher organic content fines — were tested. The contractor, Sevenson Environmental Services, identified the appropriate equipment, means, and methods to hydraulically convey and place the TLC material within the pilot area in accordance with stated performance objectives. A mat-based access road was installed to enable equipment to move the pipeline and spray nozzle for fine placement control within the pilot marsh area. The thin cover placed in the field ranged from 6-12 inches thick (versus the design thickness of 6-9 inches) to meet the minimum required thickness and account for over placement. A 30- to 45-degree spray yielded the best distribution of materials for the equipment used. Placement of sandy material was faster and more uniform than fines due to the material’s enhanced settling characteristics and ease of distribution. A modified topsoil-fines mix with a baffle plate eventually permitted optimal placement of fines within the study area while maintaining the target organic content. Turbidity in the water discharged from the pilot area was minimized by environmental controls (e.g. perimeter hay bales) installed by the contractor. The mat-based access road initially experienced some settlement due to loading on the soft sediments and marsh root mat; the road required restoration following project completion. Physical and vegetative monitoring conducted in six-month increments over a two-year period indicated strong natural recolonization of vegetation and the re-establishment of benthic species including fiddler crab. This paper presents lessons learned, design implications, and best management practices for future thin cover placement projects in estuarine settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shore & Beach\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shore & Beach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34237/1008947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shore & Beach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34237/1008947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了在乔治亚州布伦瑞克河口使用薄层沙覆盖(TLC)来恢复历史上受影响的湿地的设计概念和基础。项目地点是潮汐小溪、沼泽、咸淡河口和邻近的高地地区的混合体,这些地区受到历史上工业运营的影响。2018年完成了一个试点项目,在未来全面实施TLC之前测试覆盖层放置方法和性能。它包括在2/3英亩的沼泽地区放置6-9英寸的材料。测试了两种材料类型——砂和有机含量较高的细粒。承包商Sevenson环境服务公司确定了合适的设备、手段和方法,按照规定的性能目标,在试验区域内水力输送和放置TLC材料。安装了一个垫基通道,使设备能够移动管道和喷嘴,以便在试点沼泽区域内进行精细放置控制。在田间放置的薄盖板厚度为6-12英寸(设计厚度为6-9英寸),以满足最小厚度要求并考虑过度放置。30至45度的喷雾可使所用设备的材料分布最佳。由于砂质物料的沉降特性和易于分布,砂质物料的放置比细粒物料更快、更均匀。改良的表土-细粒混合物与挡板最终允许细粒在研究区域内的最佳放置,同时保持目标有机含量。通过承包商安装的环境控制(例如周围的干草捆),从试验区排放的水的浊度降到最低。由于软质沉积物和沼泽根垫的荷载作用,垫基通道在初始阶段经历了一定的沉降;这条路在工程完成后需要修复。在两年的时间里,以6个月为单位进行的物理和植被监测表明,植被的自然再定植和底栖生物物种(包括潮蟹)的重新定居很强。本文介绍了经验教训,设计含义,以及未来在河口设置薄覆盖放置项目的最佳管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restoration of estuarine wetlands using thin cover placement: A pilot application in Brunswick, Georgia
This paper presents the design concepts and basis for using a thin layer cover (TLC) of sand to restore historically impacted wetlands in Georgia’s Brunswick estuary. The project site is a mix of tidal creeks, marshes, brackish estuary, and an adjacent upland area that has been affected by historical industrial operations. A pilot project to test cover placement methodology and performance in advance of future full-scale TLC implementation was completed in 2018. It involved placing 6-9 inches of material in a 2/3-acre marsh area. Two material types — sand and higher organic content fines — were tested. The contractor, Sevenson Environmental Services, identified the appropriate equipment, means, and methods to hydraulically convey and place the TLC material within the pilot area in accordance with stated performance objectives. A mat-based access road was installed to enable equipment to move the pipeline and spray nozzle for fine placement control within the pilot marsh area. The thin cover placed in the field ranged from 6-12 inches thick (versus the design thickness of 6-9 inches) to meet the minimum required thickness and account for over placement. A 30- to 45-degree spray yielded the best distribution of materials for the equipment used. Placement of sandy material was faster and more uniform than fines due to the material’s enhanced settling characteristics and ease of distribution. A modified topsoil-fines mix with a baffle plate eventually permitted optimal placement of fines within the study area while maintaining the target organic content. Turbidity in the water discharged from the pilot area was minimized by environmental controls (e.g. perimeter hay bales) installed by the contractor. The mat-based access road initially experienced some settlement due to loading on the soft sediments and marsh root mat; the road required restoration following project completion. Physical and vegetative monitoring conducted in six-month increments over a two-year period indicated strong natural recolonization of vegetation and the re-establishment of benthic species including fiddler crab. This paper presents lessons learned, design implications, and best management practices for future thin cover placement projects in estuarine settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信