全关节置换术中伤口敷料预防感染的成本-效果:一项经济评估

Gregory J. Kirchner, Andrew Kim, Mark L. Dunleavy, Matthew Webb, Yehuda E. Kerbel, V. Moretti
{"title":"全关节置换术中伤口敷料预防感染的成本-效果:一项经济评估","authors":"Gregory J. Kirchner, Andrew Kim, Mark L. Dunleavy, Matthew Webb, Yehuda E. Kerbel, V. Moretti","doi":"10.60118/001c.56922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a medical and economical challenge. Specific post-operative wound dressings have been developed to mitigate risk of PJI following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but these come with added cost and unknown benefit. The purpose of this study was to determine which dressings may be economically justifiable. The average added cost of Xeroform with gauze (Xeroform+gauze), Mepilex Border, Aquacel Ag, and Dermabond Prineo dressings compared to standard dressing (Xeroform+gauze) only were obtained from institutional records and contemporary literature. Baseline infection rates following THA and TKA and average costs of PJI treatment were obtained from the literature. A break-even analysis was utilized to determine the absolute risk reduction (ARR) needed in infection rate to make each dressing cost-effective. At $3.00, a single Xeroform+gauze is economically justified if the initial infection rate for TKA (1.10%) and THA (1.62%) are reduced by an ARR of 0.01% and 0.009%, respectively. Two to three additional post-operative dressing changes increases the cost of Xeroform+gauze to $9.00-12.00 and increases the required ARR for TKA to 0.04-0.05% and for THA to 0.028-0.038%. Mepilex Border costs $29.00 and requires an ARR of 0.11% for TKA and 0.09% for THA. Aquacel Ag costs $40.00 and requires an ARR of 0.16% for TKA and 0.13% for THA. Dermabond Prineo costs $79.00 and requires an ARR of 0.31% for TKA and 0.25% for THA. Variations in estimation of initial infection rate did not impact ARR for any dressing type. Orthopaedic surgeons have multiple options for surgical dressings following total joint replacement. With respect to infection prophylaxis, Xeroform+gauze is the most cost-effective. Other specialized dressings such as Mepilex Border, Aquacel Ag, or Dermabond Prineo, require significantly higher reductions in infection rate to be economically justifiable.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cost-Effectiveness of Wound Dressings for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Economic Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Gregory J. Kirchner, Andrew Kim, Mark L. Dunleavy, Matthew Webb, Yehuda E. Kerbel, V. Moretti\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.56922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a medical and economical challenge. Specific post-operative wound dressings have been developed to mitigate risk of PJI following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but these come with added cost and unknown benefit. The purpose of this study was to determine which dressings may be economically justifiable. The average added cost of Xeroform with gauze (Xeroform+gauze), Mepilex Border, Aquacel Ag, and Dermabond Prineo dressings compared to standard dressing (Xeroform+gauze) only were obtained from institutional records and contemporary literature. Baseline infection rates following THA and TKA and average costs of PJI treatment were obtained from the literature. A break-even analysis was utilized to determine the absolute risk reduction (ARR) needed in infection rate to make each dressing cost-effective. At $3.00, a single Xeroform+gauze is economically justified if the initial infection rate for TKA (1.10%) and THA (1.62%) are reduced by an ARR of 0.01% and 0.009%, respectively. Two to three additional post-operative dressing changes increases the cost of Xeroform+gauze to $9.00-12.00 and increases the required ARR for TKA to 0.04-0.05% and for THA to 0.028-0.038%. Mepilex Border costs $29.00 and requires an ARR of 0.11% for TKA and 0.09% for THA. Aquacel Ag costs $40.00 and requires an ARR of 0.16% for TKA and 0.13% for THA. Dermabond Prineo costs $79.00 and requires an ARR of 0.31% for TKA and 0.25% for THA. Variations in estimation of initial infection rate did not impact ARR for any dressing type. Orthopaedic surgeons have multiple options for surgical dressings following total joint replacement. With respect to infection prophylaxis, Xeroform+gauze is the most cost-effective. Other specialized dressings such as Mepilex Border, Aquacel Ag, or Dermabond Prineo, require significantly higher reductions in infection rate to be economically justifiable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.56922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.56922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

假体周围关节感染(PJI)是一个医学和经济难题。特定的术后伤口敷料已经被开发出来,以减轻全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)后PJI的风险,但这些都有额外的成本和未知的益处。本研究的目的是确定哪些敷料在经济上是合理的。与标准敷料(Xeroform+纱布)相比,仅从机构记录和当代文献中获得了Xeroform加纱布(Xeroform+纱布)、Mepilex Border、Aquacel Ag和Dermabond Prineo敷料的平均增加成本。从文献中获得THA和TKA后的基线感染率和PJI治疗的平均费用。利用盈亏平衡分析来确定感染率所需的绝对风险降低(ARR),以使每种敷料具有成本效益。如果TKA(1.10%)和THA(1.62%)的初始感染率分别降低0.01%和0.009%的ARR,那么3美元的单支Xeroform+纱布在经济上是合理的。两到三次额外的术后敷料更换将使干式纱布+纱布的成本增加到9.00-12.00美元,并将TKA所需的ARR增加到0.04-0.05%,THA增加到0.028-0.038%。Mepilex Border费用为29.00美元,TKA和THA的ARR分别为0.11%和0.09%。水产养殖成本为40.00美元,TKA和THA的ARR分别为0.16%和0.13%。Dermabond Prineo的成本为79.00美元,TKA和THA的ARR分别为0.31%和0.25%。对任何敷料类型的初始感染率估计的差异都不影响ARR。骨科医生在全关节置换术后有多种手术敷料选择。在预防感染方面,静电纱布是最具成本效益的。其他专业敷料,如Mepilex Border、Aquacel Ag或Dermabond Prineo,需要明显更高的感染率才能在经济上合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cost-Effectiveness of Wound Dressings for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Economic Evaluation
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a medical and economical challenge. Specific post-operative wound dressings have been developed to mitigate risk of PJI following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but these come with added cost and unknown benefit. The purpose of this study was to determine which dressings may be economically justifiable. The average added cost of Xeroform with gauze (Xeroform+gauze), Mepilex Border, Aquacel Ag, and Dermabond Prineo dressings compared to standard dressing (Xeroform+gauze) only were obtained from institutional records and contemporary literature. Baseline infection rates following THA and TKA and average costs of PJI treatment were obtained from the literature. A break-even analysis was utilized to determine the absolute risk reduction (ARR) needed in infection rate to make each dressing cost-effective. At $3.00, a single Xeroform+gauze is economically justified if the initial infection rate for TKA (1.10%) and THA (1.62%) are reduced by an ARR of 0.01% and 0.009%, respectively. Two to three additional post-operative dressing changes increases the cost of Xeroform+gauze to $9.00-12.00 and increases the required ARR for TKA to 0.04-0.05% and for THA to 0.028-0.038%. Mepilex Border costs $29.00 and requires an ARR of 0.11% for TKA and 0.09% for THA. Aquacel Ag costs $40.00 and requires an ARR of 0.16% for TKA and 0.13% for THA. Dermabond Prineo costs $79.00 and requires an ARR of 0.31% for TKA and 0.25% for THA. Variations in estimation of initial infection rate did not impact ARR for any dressing type. Orthopaedic surgeons have multiple options for surgical dressings following total joint replacement. With respect to infection prophylaxis, Xeroform+gauze is the most cost-effective. Other specialized dressings such as Mepilex Border, Aquacel Ag, or Dermabond Prineo, require significantly higher reductions in infection rate to be economically justifiable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信