互惠教学与学生引导者及控制早期能力解说的数学学习效果比较

D. Mulyono, M. Asmawi, P. Priyono
{"title":"互惠教学与学生引导者及控制早期能力解说的数学学习效果比较","authors":"D. Mulyono, M. Asmawi, P. Priyono","doi":"10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the mathematics learning outcomes using high and low reciprocal teaching-learning models, and student facilitator model, with high and low learning independence to explain students' initial abilities. The research made use of the experimental method. A two-way Anacova method was used to test for hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 indicates that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics with a value of 4.90, which is greater than t table (0.01; 59) value of 2.39. Hypothesis 2 analysis shows that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics, with a t count value of -1.83, which is greater than t table (0.05; 59) value of-1.67.","PeriodicalId":141518,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Result of Mathematics Learning Between Reciprocal Teaching and Students’ Facilitator and Explaining by Controlling Early Ability\",\"authors\":\"D. Mulyono, M. Asmawi, P. Priyono\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the mathematics learning outcomes using high and low reciprocal teaching-learning models, and student facilitator model, with high and low learning independence to explain students' initial abilities. The research made use of the experimental method. A two-way Anacova method was used to test for hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 indicates that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics with a value of 4.90, which is greater than t table (0.01; 59) value of 2.39. Hypothesis 2 analysis shows that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics, with a t count value of -1.83, which is greater than t table (0.05; 59) value of-1.67.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在利用高低互反的教与学模型、高低学习独立性的学生引导者模型来确定数学学习成果,以解释学生的初始能力。这项研究采用了实验方法。采用双向Anacova方法对假设进行检验。假设1表明,基于t检验统计量,H0被拒绝,其值为4.90,大于t表(0.01;59)值2.39。假设2分析表明,基于t检验统计量,H0被拒绝,t计数值为-1.83,大于t表(0.05;59) value -1.67。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Result of Mathematics Learning Between Reciprocal Teaching and Students’ Facilitator and Explaining by Controlling Early Ability
This study aims to determine the mathematics learning outcomes using high and low reciprocal teaching-learning models, and student facilitator model, with high and low learning independence to explain students' initial abilities. The research made use of the experimental method. A two-way Anacova method was used to test for hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 indicates that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics with a value of 4.90, which is greater than t table (0.01; 59) value of 2.39. Hypothesis 2 analysis shows that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics, with a t count value of -1.83, which is greater than t table (0.05; 59) value of-1.67.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信