{"title":"互惠教学与学生引导者及控制早期能力解说的数学学习效果比较","authors":"D. Mulyono, M. Asmawi, P. Priyono","doi":"10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the mathematics learning outcomes using high and low reciprocal teaching-learning models, and student facilitator model, with high and low learning independence to explain students' initial abilities. The research made use of the experimental method. A two-way Anacova method was used to test for hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 indicates that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics with a value of 4.90, which is greater than t table (0.01; 59) value of 2.39. Hypothesis 2 analysis shows that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics, with a t count value of -1.83, which is greater than t table (0.05; 59) value of-1.67.","PeriodicalId":141518,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Result of Mathematics Learning Between Reciprocal Teaching and Students’ Facilitator and Explaining by Controlling Early Ability\",\"authors\":\"D. Mulyono, M. Asmawi, P. Priyono\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the mathematics learning outcomes using high and low reciprocal teaching-learning models, and student facilitator model, with high and low learning independence to explain students' initial abilities. The research made use of the experimental method. A two-way Anacova method was used to test for hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 indicates that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics with a value of 4.90, which is greater than t table (0.01; 59) value of 2.39. Hypothesis 2 analysis shows that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics, with a t count value of -1.83, which is greater than t table (0.05; 59) value of-1.67.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在利用高低互反的教与学模型、高低学习独立性的学生引导者模型来确定数学学习成果,以解释学生的初始能力。这项研究采用了实验方法。采用双向Anacova方法对假设进行检验。假设1表明,基于t检验统计量,H0被拒绝,其值为4.90,大于t表(0.01;59)值2.39。假设2分析表明,基于t检验统计量,H0被拒绝,t计数值为-1.83,大于t表(0.05;59) value -1.67。
Comparing the Result of Mathematics Learning Between Reciprocal Teaching and Students’ Facilitator and Explaining by Controlling Early Ability
This study aims to determine the mathematics learning outcomes using high and low reciprocal teaching-learning models, and student facilitator model, with high and low learning independence to explain students' initial abilities. The research made use of the experimental method. A two-way Anacova method was used to test for hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 indicates that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics with a value of 4.90, which is greater than t table (0.01; 59) value of 2.39. Hypothesis 2 analysis shows that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics, with a t count value of -1.83, which is greater than t table (0.05; 59) value of-1.67.