Judyta Dąbrowska
{"title":"Czy to już koniec krytyki? Wstęp do metakrytyki Mieczysława Porębskiego","authors":"Judyta Dąbrowska","doi":"10.4467/20843860pk.22.011.15756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the key text of Mieczysław Porębski(1921-2012), an outstanding Polish art historian and art critic, which is vital for understanding his proposed idea of ​​creating a metacritical language that would allow description of the contemporary art world − Introduction to Metacriticism (first edition around 1966, second 1983). All Porębski's publications on this subject are mentioned in the article to obtain a full picture of this concept in the researcher's writings. The importance of creating it for critical-artistic methods is emphasized. The sources of inspiration for the idea of ​​metacriticism (including bibliographic ones) and the implementation of its assumptions in the text itself are shown, taking into account the approximate mid-twentieth century historical context of methodologies developed on the basis of structuralist reflection, especially the influence of information theory and game theory. The ways in which Porębskicame to formulate the assumptions of metacriticism are presented, also through analysis of the language itself.\n\nThe idea of ​​metacriticism is placed in the wider context of the researcher's scientific work too, linking it with his proposal to divide the history of art criticism into the so-called criticism of poets and criticism of experts, as well as the idea of ​​the iconosphere postulated by him, which proves to be a pioneering one for contemporary research on visual culture. Finally, the paper suggests that the idea of ​​metacriticism can be the beginning of the present-day style of writing about art.","PeriodicalId":187788,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Kulturoznawczy","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Kulturoznawczy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860pk.22.011.15756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了Mieczysław Porębski(1921-2012)的关键文本,他是一位杰出的波兰艺术史学家和艺术评论家,这对于理解他提出的创建一种元批评语言的想法至关重要,这种语言可以描述当代艺术世界-元批评导论(1966年第一版左右,1983年第二版)。文章中提到了所有Porębski关于这个主题的出版物,以便在研究人员的著作中获得这个概念的全貌。强调了创作它对于批判艺术方法的重要性。考虑到在结构主义反思的基础上发展起来的方法的20世纪中期的大致历史背景,特别是信息论和博弈论的影响,显示了元批评思想的灵感来源(包括书目)及其在文本本身中的假设实施。通过对语言本身的分析,提出了Porębskicame对元批评的假设的方法。元批评的思想也被置于研究者的科学工作的更广泛的背景下,与他提出的将艺术批评的历史划分为所谓的诗人批评和专家批评的建议以及他所假设的图像圈的想法联系在一起,这被证明是当代视觉文化研究的先驱。最后,本文认为元批评的思想可以成为当今艺术写作风格的开端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Czy to już koniec krytyki? Wstęp do metakrytyki Mieczysława Porębskiego
The article discusses the key text of Mieczysław Porębski(1921-2012), an outstanding Polish art historian and art critic, which is vital for understanding his proposed idea of ​​creating a metacritical language that would allow description of the contemporary art world − Introduction to Metacriticism (first edition around 1966, second 1983). All Porębski's publications on this subject are mentioned in the article to obtain a full picture of this concept in the researcher's writings. The importance of creating it for critical-artistic methods is emphasized. The sources of inspiration for the idea of ​​metacriticism (including bibliographic ones) and the implementation of its assumptions in the text itself are shown, taking into account the approximate mid-twentieth century historical context of methodologies developed on the basis of structuralist reflection, especially the influence of information theory and game theory. The ways in which Porębskicame to formulate the assumptions of metacriticism are presented, also through analysis of the language itself. The idea of ​​metacriticism is placed in the wider context of the researcher's scientific work too, linking it with his proposal to divide the history of art criticism into the so-called criticism of poets and criticism of experts, as well as the idea of ​​the iconosphere postulated by him, which proves to be a pioneering one for contemporary research on visual culture. Finally, the paper suggests that the idea of ​​metacriticism can be the beginning of the present-day style of writing about art.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信